Devon Erikson explains the actual function of real traditional marriage.

:andrewtate_wojak2:

“… Here’s the why.”

“Tradcons don’t know what marriage is, or what it’s for, because they think “traditional” means 100 years ago.”

“The white, Christian, European model of marriage isn’t traditional marriage at all. It’s a redesign. A redefinition of marriage. It’s Marriage 2.0.”

“We’ll see how in a minute.”

“First we need to admit that marriage isn’t instinctive. There are species that mate for life. Sandhill cranes and whatnot. Monogamy isn’t a struggle for them. It’s instinctive. They just do it.”

“Humans do not instinctively mate for life.”

“They just mate.”

“The men mate when they can impress women, women mate when they are impressed by men, and the women of the hominid pack babysit each other’s children.”

“Fast forward to the beginning of the neolithic era.”

“Now, all of a sudden, there’s actually something to own. Fields. Cattle. Buildings.”

“Wealth. And men owned the wealth, because they were the ones who did the stuff you need to do to get it.”

“Why the men?”

“Because men have to impress women to mate. All women have to do to mate is be impressed.”

“But since property was how neolithic humans survived, and men had all the property, mating arrangements had to adapt, so that a mother could eat, and a son could be raised and inherit his father’s cattle.”

“If a man put a child in a woman, she was his wife. If he put a child in another woman, she was also his wife. If he put a child in a hundred women, he had a hundred wives.”

“And those women and children could rely on his spear for defense, and his fields and cattle for support.”

“That’s marriage.”

“If you want to understand this in context, look at the part of the bible that says a man who rapes a woman must marry her, and may not divorce her or set her aside.”

:RAPE: :woman_correction:

“Sounds insane if you look at it through the lens of modern American romantic comedies and Disney movies.”

“But ancient people didn’t care about romance and mate choice. They were busy trying to survive and build civilization.”

“So this was simple logic. It wasn’t some sort of bizarre punishment for the woman. It was simple, practical life-support logic. You unwrapped it, you bought it, now pay for it.”

“It was a matter of the rapist being held responsible.”

“Sure, might not be her favorite choice for a husband, but … so what? Pretty much nobody back then had the luxury of romantic notions.”

“This is what marriage really is.”

“You put a child in her, you’re responsible for her and the child.”

“So, if we look at this Andrew Tate video through the lens of what marriage really is, we see that he isn’t a ‘deadbeat dad’ or a ‘single father.’”

“He’s a rich man with twenty wives.”

“Under this model, he’s living up to his responsibilities just fine. Fields and cattle for support, spear for defense. Those are the actual responsibilities of a husband.”

“Not remembering anniversaries and birthdays. Not flowers. Not making her ‘feel special,’ whatever the hell that means. Certainly not changing fucking diapers.”

“So what happened?”

“Why was marriage redefined?”

“And why did that redefinition work so well for the west?”

“And why has it recently stopped working for the west?”

“Because it has stopped working. Even to the point where baseline fertility is being destroyed, and men like Tate and Musk are retreating to Marriage 1.0, which most men don’t have the money to do.”

“Every historical change happens because of technological advancement. Humans don’t get smarter with successive generations. They don’t get wiser, and they don’t get morally better. They just accumulate knowledge, and can do more stuff.”

“Traditional marriage (polygyny) requires a high male mortality rate.”

“Because X and Y sperm are produced in roughly equal numbers. This isn’t an adaptation, it’s just an outcome of the way sperm are produced.”

“That means that if the most impressive men have lots of wives, and moderately impressive men have at least one, then it’s mathematically inevitable that there are some men who can’t have any.”

“Under primitive conditions, a lot of these men die trying to become impressive. The ones who survive impregnate all the women, and the next generation is born to repeat the cycle.”

“But what happens when successful civilizations push technology and wealth to the point where men’s struggle to be impressive doesn’t carry the risk of death?”

“Well, with more surviving men, you can build faster, create some really cool shit, and upgrade your society.”

“But you need to motivate those men. How are you gonna get them to work and build and fight if they aren’t going to be rewarded with wives and a chance to build a legacy of their own?”

“And if you don’t motivate them to participate, you just let them rot, then you have a lot of angry young losers who can’t get laid hanging around. And you are in danger.”

“Why do you think Saudi Arabia sponsors terrorism and jihad against the west, on the sly?”

“Because they have to. If you have a surplus of angry young sexless losers, you better have someone to channel their resentment against, or they’re going to channel it against you.”

“So tell them the west is the author of their humiliations, and that they get seventy-two virgins if they die fighting. And they go off to Iraq and Afghanistan to fight a bunch of better trained and better equipped White Iowa farm boys, and they get mowed down like winter wheat.”

“Problem solved. Now your society is nice and stable for your old rich polygynous dudes.”

“But a major reason that the west can kick ass and solve your surplus-male problem for you is that the west figured out how to make use of all their men. Without having to kill them.”

“The west figured out a way to make less impressive men, average men, into valuable workers instead of mulch.”

“How?”

“They instituted sexual communism.”

“They got rid of polygyny.”

“Oh, there was always some wiggle room. There were still some losers who couldn’t get laid, rich dudes had secret side chicks, that sort of thing. But forcing the polygyny dynamic into the closet kept it at a sustainable low level.”

“And the system wasn’t perfect. Hell, Europe had centuries of bloody religious warfare because some celibate Italian neurotic told King Henry VIII that he couldn’t have more than one wife.”

“This was straight-up retarded. The political stability of an entire nation, and the lives of many of its people, depended on Henry VIII having a son. And they literally refused to parallelize this vital process by having him bang more than one woman at once?”

“Really?”

“Point is, monogyny wasn’t and isn’t universally a good thing.”

“But it does have advantages. It makes your whole male population productive.”

“Men won’t work, innovate, or take risks if they can’t get laid by doing so. They’ll get a part time job delivering pizza, then sit on the couch smoking weed and playing console games. Or become revolutionaries.”

“But the big question is… how the fuck did the west get women to accept monogyny?”

“That would be a strange question if you look at reality through the lens of rom-coms and Disney flicks. After all, isn’t monogyny for the benefit of women? Doesn’t it mean they don’t have to share a husband?”

“Well, no. Musk, and Tate, and thousands of other rich and powerful men throughout history, have given us countless examples of how this just isn’t true.”

“Women want an impressive husband. A winner. And if you are impressive enough, they are perfectly willing to share.”

“And why shouldn’t they be? Fields and cattle for support, spear for defense. Sharing that with your sister wives doesn’t dilute it if there’s enough to go around.”

“The women of history were not universally and unilaterally oppressed. They simply wanted things that would be unrecognizable and incomprehensible to the modern liberal.”

“So how did the west pull it off?”

“How did the west get its women to accept mediocre husbands, for the benefit of men and civilization, over being part of a king’s harem?”

“They had to change how women saw the world.”

“This isn’t as hard as it sounds.”

“Women’s instincts may be just as set in stone and intractable as men’s but one of women’s most important instincts is the instinct to follow the herd.”

“This means that they could be reprogrammed. And they were.”

“How?”

“I’ll let Shakespeare explain.”

‘Thy husband is thy lord, thy life, thy keeper, Thy head, thy sovereign, one that cares for thee,
And for thy maintenance; commits his body
To painful labor, both by sea and land;
To watch the night in storms, the day in cold,
Whilst thou li’st warm at home, secure and safe;
And craves no other tribute at thy hands
But love, fair looks, and true obedience-
Too little payment for so great a debt.
Such duty as the subject owes the prince,
Even such a woman oweth to her husband;
And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour,
And not obedient to his honest will,
What is she but a foul contending rebel,
And graceless traitor to her loving lord?
I asham’d that women are so simple
‘To offer war where they should kneel for peace,
Or seek for rule, supremacy, and sway,
When they are bound to serve, love, and obey.”

“This is it, right here.”

“Male supremacy is the secret ingredient that made western monogynous civilization work.”

“Women wish to bear the children of impressive men, men whom they look up to and admire. Not men they regard as equals.”

“So, if you need average women to mate with average men, so that those average men will join your civilization and work, you must persuade the average woman that the average man is her superior.”

“Doesn’t matter if this is correct, or incorrect, or subjective, or undecidable. Don’t bother arguing with me about it. I’ll just laugh at you because you’ve missed the point.”

“It doesn’t matter if you can actually do anything your husband can do, backwards and in heels, or whether we just have a bunch of loud feminists convincing you that you can.”

“What matters is that if you believe it, you will love your husband less.”

“And that if everyone believes it, fertility rates will plummet.”

“Like they are doing right now.”

“That’s it. That’s the secret. The reality, if there even is one, doesn’t matter. What matters is the perception.”

“A gaggle of women are bearing Andrew Tate’s children because they believe he is their superior.”

“While feminists are refusing to breed because they condition themselves to see men as their equals, and often, really, their inferiors.”

“… Elon Musk’s wives are all wealthy. High status. They can do anything they want with their lives. They choose to bear Elon Musk’s children, because he is not their equal. He is their superior.”

“And that is what women like.”

“And this is why there is no creature on earth more miserable than the White liberal feminist. Her ovaries demand a man she can look up to. Her social conditioning demands that she never submit to or even admire a man.”

“And yet these are the women we have pedestalized as hyped-up girlbosses, based on no accomplishments in particular other than having the credentials we gave them, and occupying the positions we put them in.”

“It’s not working.”

“The reason we have a fertility crisis in every modern industrialized society is that we couldn’t resist the temptation to make women equal to men, so we could move them into the workforce for cheap labor.”

“And when that happens, when they can secure an income and buy a home just like men can, whether it’s because they actually have the chops to fill men’s roles, or whether we merely gave them silly jobs for serious wages so they could play career…”

“… then they lose interest in breeding with the average man.”

“So we have a choice before us.”

“And I know what you’re thinking. This is another breathless X post, where some pundit once tells us, oh, we have a choice between this thing I want you to do, and the end of White people, technology, and Western civilization.”

“Which is really not a choice at all.”

“No, I mean we have a real choice. Two options. Benefits and drawbacks to both.”

“Marriage 2.0: monogynous western civ marriage with sex roles and sexual communism.”

“or Marriage 1.0: total sexual liberation for women, rich men with harems, surrounded by disgruntled broke guys who can’t get laid.”

“Marriage 1.0 allows women more sexual freedom, and the ability to have either a career, or Ghengis Khan’s baby, whichever. But you have a lot of angry young dudes you can’t recruit into the workforce, and your overall fertility rate will decline, because most men aren’t rich enough to play this game, and won’t be with women in the workforce competing with them and dropping the price of labor.”

“Marriage 2.0 brings back the powerful engine that made western civilization dominant over the globe. But in order to get there, you have restore men’s place of primacy in society, and this is a very tough pill for liberal idealists to swallow.”

“Nature, however, doesn’t really care. Women only want to mate with achievers.”

“So, the more you try to tweak your society so that both sexes are equally accomplished, or at least appear equally accomplished, the less babies you get.”

“And the more you get Marriage 1.0, as women gravitate towards sharing entrepreneurs and rock stars, because those are the only men they still admire.”

“Women’s expectations and mating habits are the primary force that shapes every human society. But what those expectations are is shaped by women’s urge to follow the herd.”

“So what they see on mass media matters.”

“That’s the choice and how you make it.”

“Either you start shaming women out of the rat race by the same methods you shamed them into it, and you get whitebread cookie-cutter Marriage 2.0 back.”

“Or you don’t. You do nothing. And you get real traditional Marriage 1.0 back, old testament style except with the term ‘baby momma’ substituted for ‘concubine,’ so it’s less classy. With declining fertility rates for the majority of men who can’t make it into the big pimpin’ class.”

“Throughout most of history in most of the world, this has been the norm. That’s why only thirtysomething percent of men have descendants alive today, compared to eightysomething percent of women.”

“Pick your poison.”

X link: https://x.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1891947459435250156
Nitter link: https://xcancel.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1891947459435250156#m

#marriage #women #AndrewTate

A worker on Booster 12.
B12 launched and landed during #IFT5
(photo from cnunezimages)

#SpaceX #Starship #ElonMusk

Divorce effects on millenials to generation alpha 

Had a need to write this.

On the current love crisis:

A lot of factors are discussed and accused on the current marriage/dating crisis. Sometimes on the fringes of the internet and pretty much never on the MSM the separation of the parents of the millenials to the loneliest generation is brought up. It is shown that children of divorced couples are more likely to be lonely.

Now, why?

-Lack of a parental figure: The obvious part. Even in cases where the time with the children is the same with each parent, the fact is that they have less time with them. Single parents are more likely to have to leave children in daycare, simply because they are alone at home. Lack of contact with their children = less love and less personal caring that can’t be overcome with alimony, even a millionaire one. So the children are emotionally starved at an important phase of life of their parents love and education.

A boy without his dad is without a guide to his masculine potential and energy. A girl, by contrast, won’t learn that the masculine aspect of life is more than caring about T&A.

-Lack of interaction between parents: There is a lot complaining that men today behave as little boys and lack aggressiveness. Well, what is the relation between a boy and his mom? Being a good boy to please her.

Children learn seeing the parents’ interaction. They learn that there is more sides to that woman other being their mom and more sides to that man other than being their father. Staying ignorant of them, chances are that they view and treat (at best) the other women of the world as “good mommies” and other men with complete ignorance.

-Destruction of hope in love: The dissolution of marriage, be it official or not, marks kids. Seeing that promise of warmth and care devolving into coldness, indifference and bitterness between the two most important of their lives is a trauma, even without the financial aspect.

Being witness of this, is it a wonder that the most recent generations have phobia to commitment?

-The hatred: “Mommy and daddy are not together anymore, but we still love you very much!”

“Yeah, but you don’t love each other anymore. And each half of me comes from each one of you. What does that tell?”

Whether it is a tepid friendship, indifference or scorn that is the current state between the mother and father, fact is that children see their parents as a reference to themselves. So, if the parents are unworthy of love, the child will feel that themselves are unworthy of it too.

Follow with low self-esteem, depression, etc.

Anchorage AK, on the corner of fuck around and find out.

Think of jews vs. Whites as a murder in progress. The jews crept up on Whites and, as killing off a billion people takes time, they were forced to show their hand. Whites look at the hand and see a dagger and ask, 'What's that for?' The jews say, 'Oh, that? It's nothing, pay it no mind.' Then they pull out a second dagger.
The jews' daggers are the massive anti-White surge euphemistically referred to as 'the wokening.' The combination of open season on Whites, a massive invasion by brown cannon fodder and a brutal crackdown on White speech and organization worldwide.

There's no hiding what's coming.

Elon's SpaceX Starship:

Booster 13 engine section, showing the internal piping at the aft LOX bulkhead.
Booster 13 flew on #IFT6 and was a V1 Starship booster. Booster 13 completed ascent, but had to land in the water instead of OLM-1.

#Space #SpaceX #Starship #ElonMusk


image.png
Introducing the Tea App. Where women can snitch and gossip against men, then get doxxed by male hackers.

From Tea to :RAPE:

#women

“or overthrow the government and impose a new Christian theocracy by force.

“Good luck with that.”

Exactly.

I find it highly unlikely that tradcuck simps :cuckdad: will muster an army strong enough to overthrow the ZOG USG system.

RE: https://poa.st/objects/299ca15c-0580-47c9-a57c-d6be5d672a05

@LatigoMorgan Trump won by giving Whites a homeopathic dilution of what we really want. That's why the kikes are scared shitless. One man with courage could raise an army and destroy them once and for all.
@dagda Transhumanism if the technology delivers.

@judgedread @dagda There would be as much difference between humans after the singularity and those of today as there is from those and Australopithecus. A few million years effective evolution in a matter of decades.

This is like our elderly great great grandparents seeing a flying machine for the first time and thinking, My time here is done. Too much change.

Although there are always exceptions.

@JimmyTruth 2016's scheduled installation was Hillary, with Jeb! a distant second choice if she self immolated during the campaign.

Trump 2016 was The Mule. The mutant the Seldon Plan could not anticipate or control.

That's why the perfect and steady march towards the panoptic TED talk totalitarian social credit terror state has been thrown into utter chaos.

Motivated by nothing more than lust for glory Trump sowed the wind.
@LatigoMorgan Anything that downplays racial reality is an enemy work.

That includes MAGA, despite MAGA being a temporary respite from 'woke.'
Mass deportations are permitted under current law, as are employer sanctions, cutting off welfare benefits and checking ID.

Compare to fantasies of revolution which seem to top out at less than 2000 recruits if the regime does the slightest pushback.
To make the US a legally Christian nation you either have to get 38 states to agree to a theocratic amendment, revoking the 1st, or overthrow the government and impose a new Christian theocracy by force.

Good luck with that.
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.