TenaciousWolf @[email protected]

Raise up your glasses against evil forces 🍻

Pam Bondi: How dare you! Don't you ever challenge my integrity. Do not question my ability to be fair and impartial

Balfour Declaration.
Listen up you assholes.

Oops
#minds

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1824897597490454528

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1824896842098286592

@ChristiJunior Pyra Always, Pyra Forever!

😪
#minds

>Responsibility has to come with authority. If men have an inherent responsibility to protect women by virtue of being men, or if women by birthright are to expect physical protection from any man at any time, then it has to come with a standard of authority over women.
Men have no authority over women, yet women still assume men to hold the sacred, God given duty to protect them and die for them at the drop of a hat for the sole reason that she is a woman and they are men.
Until we reach a point in which men once more hold authority over women, we cannot expect any man anywhere anytime for any woman to assume the responsibility of fighting for her.
Even in cases of strangers, there was an assumption that a woman either was, or will be a good, dutiful woman, wife, and mother. Women today do not get that benefit of the doubt. Why would I risk my life to protect what is more than likely a random whore that offers neither me directly or me indirectly through a contribution to the social contract anything at all?
I'd love to live in a world where all men can confidently look at a woman and give her the benefit of the doubt that she is a good, dutiful woman worthy of protecting. It would give me comfort to know that if my wife, girlfriend, mother, sister, daughter, etc were out there, a man would stand up to protect her as I would theirs if need be, but that's not the world we live in.
I'm not dying for some random liberal whore that only acknowledges my existence when I suddenly gain a use for her.

Based.