There is a meme claiming

Low & High Intelligent people tend to believe the same things

But Average intelligent people tend to believe something that contradicts them

Sometimes it seems like my first opinion on an issue started at lpw intelligence then changed to a contradicting middle intelligence opinion then after further thought and research becomes that of high intelligence which was my initial belief at my low intelligence stage

Sometimes I go straight from low to high skipping middle

@shortstories
It's easy to explain. Low intelligence people must face against reality directly and must learn to deal with it or straight up die.

Middle intelligence people are one or two steps away fron direct reality but can't really process abstractions...they are like automatons who can follow instructions.

High intelligence is where you are able to differentiate reality from abstractions, understand their relationship and create mew things/concepts that are effective irl.

IMO it doesn't really track IQ, it's more a case of intellectual imposter syndrome (they are actually imposters).

People who want to consider themselves smarter than they really are listen to a lot of big wordy pseudointellectual mumbo-jumbo from other people want to consider themselves smarter than they are, and they don't understand it, but they pretend that if they just nod along, they'll convince people that they're smart.

So they all end up kind of converging on these general consensuses (consensii?) like "trust the science" etc...

@cjd @Zeb

Mathematicians tend to have high IQ and tend to really have to be smart in a way that involves something more than wordy mumble jumble and also I do not remember a math major ever telling me they were smart because they got a high IQ score and they do not need to because being able to do the math is proof that you are smart in and of itself

@cjd @Zeb

Sometimes math equations people choose to model reality do not reflect reality but there are rules to how the equations work to get an input from an output or vice versa that you have to be smart to know how to use without a calculator or computer

@shortstories @cjd
Math is a good example. If it's easy to simplify, follow instructions and even model things according to already existing formulas and functions, I consider it low math: science computing, statistics, engineering, finance, etc.

Then you have high math, where you're not only using it but creating new theorems, new models, simulating new realitiesL Physicists, theoretical mathematicians, applied math and researchers, maybe astrophysicians and cryptologists.

Follow

Mid intelligence can be competent low mathematicians and they are the backbone of maintaining a first world country civilization running and progressing.

High intelligence will tend to be on the former camp because they can process the level of abstraction necessary and they can apply it to the real world, where they will actually put the instruction in low math format for the mid IQ people. They're vital but they're a very small group.

The issue today is we're running out of both.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.