When rebuilding society:
I think it would be useful to adopt ideas that have proven to be useful throughout history. Reject the bad, keep the good, and all that.
Maybe it seems obvious, but most successful civilizations operate with two separate categories of people - an in-group, and an out-group. For example, war-brides come from the out-group... whereas brides from the in-group (the female offspring of a man of the in-group) may have elaborate courtship customs.
I'm a proponent of arranged marriages for in-group brides. Negotiations should be conducted between a prospective groom, and the bride's father.
And naturally, simping for random females would be verboten... but in cases of mistreatment and whatnot, the bride's natural father would pursue any claims (in the case of broken bones, knocked out teeth, consistent publicly visible bruising, etc).
Other male relatives may pursue a duel, on a mistreated sister/niece/cousin's behalf.
Here's my beef with arranged marriage.
I don't want to be forced to wife a bitch that's cray.
I would much rather be a confirmed bachelor and chill.
@basedbagel - I wouldn't see it being an issue for you or any man. Because at the end of the day, a man can provide for himself over the course of his life, whereas a woman can't.
No one can force a man to marry (outside of India - since excluding Nagaland, India is horribly gynocentric). Because a man can always just walk away.
And it it turns out he doesn't have what it takes... 🤔 Well, dominance instinct says "fuck that guy - darwinism in action."
