I gotta disagree with some of what this dude said here.

Pushing drugs, gambling, and prostitution are "victimless crimes?"

I really don't think so.

The drug addict is slowly destroying himself, and there's always the chance that he will do it quickly with an overdose. I've known a few people that are gone now because of that. Good hearted, sweet people that I loved.

Gambling. Well, it's not deadly in and of itself, but many people with the genetic proclivity for chronic gambling have gone broke and ruined their lives, and when they're family men that means that they also ruined the lives of their Wives and children. Hardly victimless if you think about it. And the casinos don't give a shit. They're all run by gangsters.

Prostitution. I really don't believe that any young woman gets involved in that shit because they want to... even the slutty chicks. I don't think any young girl ever dreamed of becoming a hooker when she grew up, the way that a lot of young boys dream of being firemen or police officers. Mostly, they're poverty stricken young women who don't have much in the way of options. I've known a few prostitutes (I'm a White boy who grew up poor, so I've lived in some sketchy places). Those girls all had a dead look in their eyes, like their souls were gone. That's why I've never "been with" a prostitute even though I've been propositioned many times. I wasn't going to exploit their vulnerability and actively take part in their ruin. Most of them end up miserable, and a lot die young either from drugs or suicide, and some are murdered by their Johns or pimps.

Yeah... victimless? I don't think so.
The libertarians - to a man - are all deluded, selfish assholes.
My friend is the only non-retarded one ideologically I've talked to at length (knew one for my short stint on Twitter but didn't get a full grasp on his beliefs). My friend's basically just NS but worried about the kikes and reds taking power from us when we win and underestimates the ability needed to steer our people back on track after we get rid of the wogs lmao.
@Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @zeke @freepatriot A lot of people visit Libertarianism when they figure out the system is a lie and figure total Freedom of activity is the answer. It's actually Modern Satanism i.e. "Do what thou wilt, shall be the whole of the law". For me it was probably my high school years. I turned the corner at about the same time I realized that Atheism was also a lie designed to turn your mind off and put you on the Left Hand Path. I was all of 17 years old when this happened:
@Mister_Sunshine @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @zeke @freepatriot Lolberts are the same as communists in regards of judging the human animal.
Atheism's interesting, as you can in-fact believe in something within pure material reality, god/s or no gods (I'm not a pure atheist anymore mind) in my mind it's "atheism™️" which is what you speak of, The fake and gay shit currently tied to atheism, that's just my 2 cents.
@Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke You are an Agnostic, not an Atheist. Contrary to what the usual suspects in Academia want people to believe, A-Gnostic means "No Knowledge" i.e. "Don't Know".
@Mister_Sunshine @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke Agnostic is a cop-out word.
If you don't worship or pray, live your daily life without deferring to a deity, don't do anything else that would depend on you believing in it's existence, then it's silly to call this person an agnostic just because he answers "I can't prove it 100% that God doesn't exist"
you wouldn't call a Christian saying the same or quoting Pascal's wager an agnostic.
@Mister_Sunshine @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke what Siegfried said is true, there is "atheism TM" or atheism plus I think they call it, which is just liberal nihilism. These people don't reject the church because they don't believe in a god, they reject it because it is a totem for traditional values which they do not like
The Right= pre existing race and culture jews want to loot, degenerate ,enslave and genocide
The Left= the AIDS mind virus that the jews use to weaken and get the pre existing race and culture to destroy itself under the guise of goodness and virtue
@RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke @Mister_Sunshine yeah. There always were atheists against the Jews because religion ultimately isn't the important distinction. What you said is.
What do atheist types have to say about what all this is, I've only ever heard them trash talk people's religions and the type of God they worship but never a solid explanation or theory as to what the fuck it is we're doing here having to go to work and pay rent and shit 😏
That, or what all of this is and where it came from 😏 Im no Christian but I don't not believe in something. I have a pretty rational explanation of what life and the universe is, although I don't claim to "know" anything for certain because nobody does except for maybe the ruling class elite who have obviously severed people's connection to the earth and universe
@RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke @Mister_Sunshine well for the connection I'd say a lion doesn't think about god at all yet nobody would say his connection to the universe is severed, so it's not really an atheism problem. It's just the modern Jew world.

"Where it came from" can be a "foundational myth" for a people, this is who we are and where we came from type stuff, so more like the philosophical outlook on life. And that can be very positive regardless of religion.

If it is meant literally however, I'd say that atheists, or even mainstream science in general for that matter, has the best explanation currently available. There were millions of little things where religious people concluded it must have been God that made it so. Dog breeds, the races, the continents, the firmament, the seasons, the sun, the species of animal, water, cells, molecules, atoms, anything you can think of.
The impulse to appreciate natures beauty and calling it divine is noble enough, but they all turned out wrong. *One* atheist outlook is just thinking statistically. Why would this one specific thing we haven't understood yet be God? All the other things weren't and nothing is different about this one. The origin of species wasn't God, the origin of the planet wasn't God, the origin of the Sun wasn't God, why would the origin of the universe be?
If the same standard some smug Christians apply to atheism, i.e. "oh you don't know this one thing 100%? Therefore, Christianity is true" was applied to their own mythos, it would collapse immediately, since you can't go from "we currently have limited understanding about origin of the universe" doesn't mean "therefore the world was created in 7 days by God and then he kicked Man out of Paradise"
Did you say "firmament" 😏 are you one of those that believe the earth is a snow globe
Not sure exactly what I think on our origins to be honest, though I lean twords evolution until proven otherwise
Big Bang + Evolution = Everything you see now

Me: "But, isn't the "Big Bang" contingent upon an anomaly that you Atheists call a "singularity" wherein the known laws of physics don't apply? Why can't that singularity be God?"

Atheists: "Give us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest."
@zeke @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @Mister_Sunshine That's really not how an atheist thinks about these things and your conclusion is on it's face illogical.
Atheists: "We don't know what exactly happened at the big bang yet, (but we are getting closer even though it was billions of years ago by the way)"
You: "Oh ok you can't explain 100% therefore the biblical explanation is 100% true for some reason even though it made multiple predictions that are obviously false"

You're already on the ropes when you discuss the big bang with an atheist since the original Christian position, i.e. "God made the world in 7 days literally", is no longer sustainable.
@zeke @WandererUber @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare These conversations always lead to those that like the label "Atheist" claiming that words do not actually have any specific meaning. They can mean w/e someone chooses they mean to suit their agenda. Like the 4chan cap I posted in my "Atheists are just low level Satanists who don't cash their paychecks" exchange with Chris Langden, actually buying into Atheism requires Nihilism, i.e. If there is no such thing as Truth, then it follows that Words can not convey Truth. Therefore very concise terms like A- Theist (No God) or A- Gnostic (No Knowledge) can mean w/e the person wants it to mean.

It's All So Tiresome.

Arguing with a Nihilist really is the biggest Fool's Errand ever devised.
@Mister_Sunshine @zeke @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare >actually buying into Atheism requires Nihilism, i.e. If there is no such thing as Truth, then it follows that Words can not convey Truth.

You keep saying that but I don't understand why. Yes the screenshots claimed this. But for what reason should this be? Atheism in principle is literally "I am not religious because I don't think it is true" that alone confirms that they believe in truth. A satanist would presumably believe in Satan, which atheists don't.
And in a purely material world there’s plenty to believe in, blood being an obvious one. (While I’m not one any more, I understand my old world well, I converted due to some non-athesitic/agnostic beliefs I held (mainly my ideals being a universal truth and a hunch we’re wholly distinct from beasts) and my general thought process lining up with Armanism once my fren explained it to me when I was curious)

Edit: Asides Armanism gave us the Armanen runes and Die Schwartz Sonne so there’s that too lol
@Mister_Sunshine @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @zeke @WandererUber ironic since here "know" has just been twisted into "believe hard enough" rather than the "justified true belief" that would be used by anyone who isn't steeped in postmodernism.

nihilism doesn't even have anything to do with truth, you don't know what either of those words mean..
@Mister_Sunshine @Cyrillic @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @zeke my guy asking a machine that only spits out "expected tokens" and has no conception of Truth about what Truth is 💀
Show newer
Show newer
What this "Wanderer" dude doesn't know is that I was an atheist for most of my life, but then changed my mind because I asked God one day "God, I don't know if you're real, but if you are, I want to know you. Please show me something, a sign of some sort, or guide me in some way. Lead me to the truth."

And he did. It didn't happen overnight. It was a long, slow process, but he showed me in an unmistakable, undeniable way. That was 8 years ago.

Like I said, I was an atheist for most of my life. I'm familiar with the arguments that guys like "Wanderer" habitually use because I made them myself for years and years. I have no desire to review all that bullshit. It never does any good. And I know that because back in my Atheist days nothing any Christian said to me had even the slightest effect on me beyond invoking uproarious laughter at times. I was so full of myself. I looked down on them from an imagined sense of superiority. Yeah, I was a first rate asshole.

But God opened my eyes.
@zeke @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @Mister_Sunshine >I was so full of myself. I looked down on them from an imagined sense of superiority.
Well if there is anything that would warrant this, it's that I've talked to a lot of Christians who always insult you like this. You can be as cordial as you want, sooner or later some people will just make stuff up about you and sperg for no reason because they are angry that you do not agree with them
I don't block people on here but I had to block someone I've known on here for years for that very reason 😏 they started needling me and rolling their eyes on all of my posts because they were angry that I wasn't a Christian and am pretty open about sharing my own personal beliefs. I don't mind if someone's a Christian if it works for them. I don't like the chastising or the shaming you into believing bullshit, it's childish.
Show newer
Yeah, I know. There certainly are Christians like that. It's definitely not good for the brand. I try to be careful not to do that, except in a joking way with people I know well. As far as I know, I haven't slandered you in any way.
Show newer
I believe in God 😏 I just don't think God is invisible or has a carrot on a stick for me. I believe God beats my heart, regulates my breathing, makes the earth orbit around the sun, the waves in the ocean and the daffodils come up every spring. The real changes we wanna see are up to us and we have legs, arms, hands, eyes and brains to make all that happen. We're the guiding hand. The life process itself is God. That's my belief
Show newer
While my own ideas are a bit more autistic I’m squarely of that view as well, we’re the masters of our own destiny, no one else.
Show newer
@homesteader_surfer @zeke @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @Mister_Sunshine @WandererUber One glass. By the time the bottle is empty god is all blurry and talking fucked up and you are no longer impressed.
Aye, IK and I’ve seen at least one Atheist say exactly that, And even then really isn’t much of a technical difference between a Atheist and Agnostic, I‘ve called myself both overtime (admittedly I fell under atheism™️ to a degree when I was younger though not full on) and I wouldn’t consider them all too distinct.
(Note I’m no longer an Agnostic, I’m an Esoteric Volkish Pagan)
@Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke @Mister_Sunshine Exactly. it doesn't really matter what standard of evidence you have, either you believe in god(s) or you don't. Technically, only the truly undecided are agnostics. Doesn't mean an atheist/theist can't change his mind in the face of whatever he considers new evidence, like you apparently did.

One would hope that pushing atheismTM is going to be a double-edged sword for them, since with the actual atheism part comes a lot of critical reasoning that can be used on their idols as well. For example the evolution stuff gets you thinking about races and the sexes and so forth. Dawkins got into hot water a few times when he started attacking the "wrong things"
I still have that streak in me. I still like the idea of not caring what people do behind closed doors between consenting adults.

The issue that got me to fash out was just how flagarantly and deliberately they took the time to violate all three of those caveats the second the leash was loosened just a little.

I can't settle for it now, because they need to die screaming for it.
Non-retarded lolberts do exist, one’s a good friend of mine, granted in his case it’s moreso fear our enemies (and yes he knows who they are lmao) will take over our systems of power again.
@Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @freepatriot @zeke @Mister_Sunshine I lean that way myself, although I'm more of an anarchist insofar as I have any political views
@Mister_Sunshine @freepatriot @zeke that's a skill issue on their part, we shouldn't deprive them of the opportunity to weed themselves out of the gene pool.

@freepatriot Yes anything illegal will create a “black market” but humans are the problem. Not economics. The greed of man to provide for the lust of want…thats the issue.

Humans perception and perspective is often the problem 😏 we're perfectly serviceable creatures otherwise
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.