@EvolLove @freepatriot How did she pervert everything?

@Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot Libertarianism is a social trap for White people. Do no harm. Don't judge others. Live and let live. Sounds great until you realize that humans are weak and stupid. They desperately need strong leadership and harsh consequences. Society only functions well with standards that fly in the face of Libertarianism. No drugs. No porn. No prostitution, no usury, etc. Libertarianism disarms Whites and allows a clear path for Jewish supremacy to flood the zone with porn, usury, no borders and lots of brown people.

Unfortunately, I am speaking from personal experience.

@agaperealm @Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot State Libertarianism
State Civnat
State Liberalism
State Democracy
State Christianity

It all removes the Authority and agency to act
from the tax cattle

The entire point of Jewish Statism
Control the goyim of this realm
to prevent uprising

@charliebrownau @Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot So, what then is the answer? A king?

@agaperealm @Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot I posted the solution here :-
https://substack.com/@charliebrownau/note/c-119901169

@charliebrownau @Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot Isn't this small scale, localized Libertarianism minus usury?

@agaperealm @Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot Basically its

Localism (Self Governance)
+ Ethnic Nationalism
+ ethnic Protectism
+ Community Currency

@agaperealm @freepatriot @charliebrownau @Francisco

Yes a king or an emperor would be endlessly better.

U might reject the notion on pure reflex. But that is only because U have been conditioned to think in a certain way by Jewish dominated movies and culture for all of Ur life.

Contrary to what we have been told. Diktators, Kings, Emperor, even the term Tyrant. Is not something bad but always tremendously superior to any democracy.

Mein Kampf proves this with irrefutable logic and examples

@EvolLove @freepatriot @charliebrownau @Francisco Oh no. Not at all. A king is exactly what we need.

@agaperealm

U sire. Make an excellent point

@agaperealm @EvolLove @freepatriot @charliebrownau Doesn't seem like a good idea given that humans are weak and stupid...

@Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot @charliebrownau Yes. The king will also be corrupt at some point. Augusto Pinochet came in as a Chilean dictator and took the country from a depressed, Cuba like, country to an economically thriving country by expelling the Communists (throwing many from in-flight helicopters). The life of the Chilean people went from destitute and hopeless to prosperous and hopeful. He also succumb to the temptation of corruption and personally enriched himself and friends as well. It is inevitable and a price I would gladly pay for the at large positive social and economic outcomes.

@agaperealm

A democracy can never achieve something of greatness

Yes here are some examples of bad tyrants, contrary to what we have been spoon fed to think it is not the norm

While every nation that was given democracy is failing

While a dictator can achieve greatness

But if he should prove to be incompetent he will be replaced

While it is impossible to replace the "democratic governemnt" it is there, whether we like it or not. Even though it is never ruling in favor of the people

@agaperealm

Simply voting for the left or the right will never change anything. Both parties serves their Jewish masters. It is of little use to engage in those movements that swing from left to right and back to left again.

We vote every 4th or 5th year and think that we have achieved something. While in reality we have achieved nothing.

But bot only are we fooled to waste our political efforts on a mirage.

To make matters worse, this also serves to keep the nations divided.

@agaperealm @Francisco @EvolLove @freepatriot Its why in a local/district situation
it will require a group to govern


Workers guild
Civial Armed Force
Business Alliance
Farmers coop

not one single person

@agaperealm @EvolLove @freepatriot @charliebrownau Yup, Pinochet saved our country from the communist dictatorship that was brewing.

@agaperealm

I'm close to someone who used to live in a dictatorship
This person confirmed all that is stated in Mein Kampf

How the nations was thriving under the dictator and there were hardly any crimes at all
Vehicles, cars, bicycles, could be parked unlocked anywhere

There were no violence. No starvation. Schools hospitals BNP everything was going the right way

After endless pressure from the west (JEWS) They became a democracy And it has created a nightmare of what used to be a paradise

@EvolLove The last Shah of Iran, Muammar Gaddafi the Romanoffs, the list goes on and on.

@agaperealm

Bashar Al Assad is right up there.

Anyone who nationalize their banking system and natural resources has to be fought with, destroyed so that the Jews can take over their banking system and so that Jewish globalist companies can take over their mines and wells.

U know, Freedom.

@freepatriot

The problem with Globalism as Adolf Hitler explained it. Is that instead of trying to find common grounds with Ur own people U will find cooperators in foreign nations. I don't remember the exact quotations at all. This is one of the reason I have to re-read Mein Kampf over and over again.

But in short. Cooperating with political interests from foreign nations rather than within Ur own nation is a way of destroying the Nation from within.

All the Jews programs are INTERNATIONAL!

@EvolLove @freepatriot The user is referring to a passage from Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, where he discusses his views on globalism and its impact on national unity. Based on the description provided, the passage likely comes from Volume 1, Chapter 10 or Volume 2, Chapter 1 of Mein Kampf, where Hitler critiques internationalism and emphasizes the importance of national cohesion over cooperation with foreign entities.In Volume 1, Chapter 10 ("Causes of the Collapse"), Hitler argues that cooperation with foreign powers or ideologies undermines national strength and loyalty, leading to internal division. He contrasts this with his ideal of a unified national community rooted in shared identity and interests. Similarly, in Volume 2, Chapter 1 ("Weltanschauung and Party"), he elaborates on the dangers of internationalism, claiming it erodes the sovereignty and integrity of the nation by prioritizing foreign alliances over domestic unity.The exact quotation is not provided in the query, and the user admits to not recalling it precisely. However, the sentiment aligns with Hitler’s broader rhetoric in these sections, where he warns against external influences diluting national loyalty. For a precise quotation, you would need to revisit the text, as the user suggests doing. If you want me to search for or analyze a specific passage from Mein Kampf or related content, please let me know! - Grok

@Bianca @freepatriot

I remember those 2 examples. Plus it took me some time to translate "weltanschauung" to World view. James Murphys translation, is clearly superior to all other translations. He was the official translator for NAP. For reasons NAP canceled the printing of the translation of Mein Kmapp into English. Yet it remain authentic. That said. I have no idea why he didn't translate world view.

Regarding seeking political support in foreign nations, in the end it is a form of treason

@EvolLove @freepatriot I keep hearing about the Dalton translation...

@freepatriot

Since the Jew works endlessly to destroy every nation and in their place put themselves as rulers of a global government with no borders.

That is why all their efforts has to be anti-nationalist.

This is why National Socialism was such a great threat to the Jewish hunger for world domination. A goal that they have already reached. Today their global banking system dominate all but a few minor nations.

This is why every great movement has to be of a Nationalist nature.

@EvolLove @freepatriot The difference is that Capitalism works. Communism is for dummies and lazy people who want to sponge off the real workers.