FreedomPatriot @[email protected]

@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot

If a sovereign can not break rules then how can one sovereign punish another sovereign for breaking rules without a worldwide government?

Is it legal for the one sovereign to punish the other sovereign?

If it is not legal then you have international anarchy

If it is legal for one sovereign to punish another sovereign for breaking rules then a sovereign can break rules

anarchy used to be considered the furthest right on the political spectrum but a bunch of faggots took it over and made it all leftist and gay. they did the same thing to libertarianism.

@freepatriot

Kill the jews and you’ll be free. Simple as.

Quote: Jonny Fever

The way you define anarchy just establishes that it's nothing more than an chimera. There is has never been, not will there ever be, such a state as "an absence of rulers."

You also make a severe logical mistake by entailing that a sovereign can break rules. A sovereign cannot. This is law 101. The sovereign is itself not bound by laws.

@Humpleupagus @freepatriot @MasterSimper

Anomie is the absence of laws
Anarchy is the absence of rulers

Rulers make excuses for breaking rules by maintaining a monopoly on breaking the rules that they say other people should keep

@freepatriot

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB

Playlist

Natural Law Seminar - New Haven, CT

by Mark Passio

youtube

Remember that time when the ATF and FBI turned up with guns, tanks, choppers and tear gas and murdered 82 people including 28 children simply because they were suspicious about the way they were living and then posed next to the dead bodies in photographs?

Bonobos keep order by fucking each other in the butt. Would you like to return to monke? 😏