Show newer
@greyknight @freepatriot

It's an interesting point. The kings chose to step aside instead of producing mass bloodshed.
@greyknight @freepatriot

Lesser aristocrats have titles to land and rule local areas, so they have status just not Big Dog status.
@greyknight @freepatriot

"the self interest must be something that puts ALL on the same level."

Why?

"goal congruency."

The nation + excellence. It is all we need.

"comfort and complacency breeds the incompetent and makes the corruption more possible"

This is why you sequester wealth.
@yukiame @greyknight @freepatriot

It's a cause-effect relationship.

Drinking beer does not make great warriors (B->A) but great warriors drink beer (A->B).
@Escoffier @h4890 @freepatriot @Wtdrisco In a way I fall into that category. I welcome total annihilation from God, Nuclear weapons, Aliens, or Volcanic Eruption. It doesn't make a difference just so long as my ideological enemies suffer more than me

Fascism in a way is all about vengeance (justified, sanitized revenge) and thats what I'm certainly here for, regardless of the form that vengeance takes.
@greyknight @freepatriot

the ruler is self-interested, but his self-interest coincides with that of the nation

you have lesser aristocrats to ensure succession
@greyknight @freepatriot

#monarchism limits the power and influence of retards (aka leftism) and markets, also keeps the foreign out

@dictatordave @freepatriot @Wtdrisco @Escoffier

I agree, a lot of communists and socialists seem to be driven by envy and spite, and not out of any higher moral feelings.

My favourite example of this goes like this:

Socialist: Taxes are so great, we help everyone!

Me: Ok, but there's nothing stopping you from paying taxes if you like, and me, as a libertarian, to not pay taxes. We would both be happy. You helping people, and me, helping people through my business and the services I

Show older