My thoughts on democrats and saying no to guns.
Without lethal force, laws are meaningless. It’s all about power for them, they think if they submit to those who rule, they’ll have a seat at the throne when history has shown eventually after the competition is wiped out they eat themselves.
@TenaciousWolf Yes, democracy, like most, if not all, other forms of government, ultimately rests on violence.
That is why it is not possible for libertarians to vote. It goes against the non-aggression principle. Christians too, should, if they are not hyppocrites, not vote.
@h4890 @TenaciousWolf
Voting is a mistake. As with everything, only those who carry responsibility and are net contributors should have the authority and voice to make decisions.
By definition, they are responsible for others too - heavy is the head that wears the crown.
@Zeb @TenaciousWolf This is the way! Only those who pay in, get a say. The ones who don't must remain silent. That would, for a start, improve our current political decisions enormously.
@h4890 @Zeb @TenaciousWolf If Whites are the minority in their own countries and the elites choose nons as their workers, how would a pay to play system improve things?
Net taxpayers contribute more to global homo than random criminals. Rewarding the former is a mistake.
You're right that violence decides everything. The answer isn't to change how voting works for the sake of libertarians and Judeo Christians, it's to stop being domesticated and start valuing genes over everything else.
@Based_Accelerationist @h4890 @TenaciousWolf
That's also a trap if you value genes over everything else. That's a weakness that the jews have historically exploited by transmitting their genes/lineage through their women, to the point where the jewish whore who makes plastic surgery and disguises herself as a white woman.
Life is about implementing several solutions and building on top of each other. You start by genes, then net contributors and authority to those responsible in that community.
@Zeb @Based_Accelerationist @TenaciousWolf Genes are value free in and of themselves. In order to make sense, you must specify the traits you like and justify why those trains and not others.
Once that step is done, we can then move on to discussing genes, which genes gives rise to the traits and based on that, who will live and who will die.
@h4890 @Zeb @TenaciousWolf These are the traits I like and will defend: My own.
These are the traits I don't like and will not defend: Others.
That's how normal people think. We aren't global citizens, we're genetic legacies.
But go ahead and call your own genes "value free", the tribalistic elites will likely agree.
If you're White, stop repeating controlled op talking points and consuming content made by government assets, watch Blackpilled and KnowMoreNews instead.
@Based_Accelerationist @Zeb @TenaciousWolf What are your own traits?
I'm just trying to understand, and through that, make you clarify your position.
You will benefit from this exercise.
@h4890 My genetic traits. My genotype, my phenotype, they go far beyond skin color, they determine everything, from the way we think and act to how we look.
We all understand it's in our interest to defend our offspring, our family members at the expense of strangers. Race is an extension of that family. A race that protects itself will thrive (Js) and those who betray it will lose everything (Whites).
Listen to the elites/winners and you'll see life is genetic warfare: https://media.nicecrew.digital/d1cb90a4cf23a23b27d459c48f51869b6174e31484b8d5fa3b7c53b09cbdf11d.mp4
@Based_Accelerationist Ok, so based on what you are saying, it is only your unique traits. To me it seems that would put you into conflict with all of the rest of the world.
Also, what I do not understand, is that your traits, defined as _yours_ will only exist once, in you, unless you clone yourself. So it does not seem like a stable set to base any ideology on.
When it comes to defending offspring, I think we're making some progress.
Are you saying that one of your fundamental core
@h4890 No, based on what I'm actually saying, animals/people defend the genetic traits they possess. Those traits aren't all unique to the individual, they are shared between family members and the race.
The more genetic traits a people have in common, the tighter the group will be. Which is why multiculturalism is such a nasty weapon.
Everyone understands this, don't pretend otherwise. Genes are the purpose of our lives, whether we realize it or not.
Did you click on the link? Thoughts?
@Based_Accelerationist Genes is just a biological construct. It has no value. You need to separate out science, descriptions of how we work as organisms, which is genes, from your ideology and subjective values that govern your life.
I still do not understand what your values are. Referring to genes and traits, is like referring to a brick, a car, or the color blue. Genes don't work in isolation, they work to optimize given an environment
@Based_Accelerationist opposing something else, and not by positive internal values.
The risk here is that it will leave you empty, for instance, if you moved to a monoculture.
@Based_Accelerationist As for the link, I must have missed it. I only found a link to a video, and I only consume written text when I discuss philosophy. Videos are a waste of time in my opinion. If you find a transcript, I will read it.
@Zeb Look Zeb, it was a bot. Robotic speech, inability to engage with real topics, can't even watch videos and needs a transcript lol.
I wonder why there are all these fake accounts telling us we should want a pay to play meritocracy and to not put race first.
I'm telling you, everything you hear on TFM is poison, weaponized half-truths (like female nature having a destructive side) which he sells as THE "Head of the Hydra" so Whites give up and buy sex dolls instead of having kids.
@Based_Accelerationist
I don't disagree, he might be a bot but from our point of view, we need to read everything with a grain of salt and consider the argument if it's worthy and always strive to see if it can improve our own understanding.
TFM and other accounts might only spew poison, but it's not a problem for me personally as I'm jaded enough to really double check everything and validate against the real world.
The hard part for me was understanding most people aren't able to do that.
@Based_Accelerationist
Plus, I personally don't agree that genes are everything when it comes to sucess, I see it as the basic block on which every single other positive trait can be built on - that's step 1, but the work doesn't stop there.
Reality operates bottoms-up, where smaller pieces interact individually to make up the greater parts. That's why the foundation is the most important part, the rest can't stand on their own.
Genes and biology are the basic blocks gifted to us by evolution.
@Zeb Some things are difficult to double check.
TFM doesn't deny basic facts, it's the details, he lies by omission and makes up his own poisonous stories to fill the void (Putipu, Technocrats, 9/11, etc.). When it comes to more alternative/abstract concepts, like TWRA, sex dolls or the net taxpayer voting system, he sells those ideas based on the purposefully deceptive and narrow world view he preaches, where race doesn't matter, poor people are the problem and women are the head of the hydra.
@Zeb I didn't notice it at first, I thought he was arrogant, which was the only way someone could believe themselves to be smarter than the elites. It took a while to find enough evidence to fully dismantle the worldview people like him promoted, although I never bought into the celibacy/sex doll propaganda.
It takes time and effort, which not everyone can afford. Channels like his are doing Whites a big disservice. Those of us who care about truth and about genes, must expose their lies.
@Based_Accelerationist and are therefore not static, but change, given the environment.
Then you are mixing in culture, which has nothing to do with genes.
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your point. It seems very muddled to me.
Multiculturalism, is about clashes between subjective value systems, and has nothing to do with genes.
Yes, it is destructive, especially forced multi-culturalism, but defining your purpose as anti-X, seems limiting. That means your life is governened by