Having a bit of a think here with the whole Steven Crowder getting divorced. He and his wife were married for a number of years, and the moment they have kids, she divorces him.
One theory is that having children revealed cracks that already existed in the marriage, as having children makes everything more difficult. But it still seems strange that she would not have divorced him sooner.
Side note, having children involved makes divorce far, far worse.
Not saying there is anything more to the story, but their kids were hardly that old when the divorce started. Statistically, I have seen that it takes 4 years after the youngest kid is born before this sort of thing happens. Thus I have suspiciouns.
I have to wonder if Hilary thought poorly of Steven as a father. Though that is also the sort of thing you should know after being married for years and all.
And if it was not about the children, I would think she would have pulled the pin before they had children, because it is a really, really bad idea to have a divorce when you have the kids so young. Not unless there are extreme circumstances.
Though that would be assuming she thought things through. And often, women do not.
@houseoftolstoy This is all news to me and I don't really care. Just offering another common option to your theory.
She got the kids and hence didn't need to be married to him anymore.