Something just occurred to me when doing my daily reconnaissance listening to the daily libshit "news" from NPR. They had a segment on the election in Turkey, being all melodramatic about "autocracy" if Erdogan wins. Then it hit me, their stoking fears about "autocracy" and all that is just a smokescreen to cover for the current globohomo tyranny that is taking place in countries like America.
So long as we have "muh democracy," it apparently makes government tyranny fine.
Just because you can "vote" for candidates that make rules on your behalf does not magically make the tyranny non-existent. It just makes it more difficult to dispose of the tyrannical system because it does not simply come down to taking down a single ruler.
In the US, even if Joe Biden were to croak tomorrow, it would not change one thing. That is because he is not the problem, the whole government infrastructure is, as those who are pulling the strings can hide quite easily in the shadows.
Having a singular ruler with all the power means that there is a single point of failure. His rule will either be great or terrible based on his actions alone.
But what can be done when the problem is entrenched among many different groups and individuals? You are dealing with many heads of the hydra, unable to solve anything politically with the vote (which can and has often been stolen).
And to make matters worse, many in power are unelected and not even check by the fake voting anyways.
So I am not going to fret over "AUTOCRACY BAD" when having a democratic system (fake or real) is not making for a free system either. Having many different slave drivers that you "vote" on does not make the slavery any better than having it under one slave driver.