After finishing Tears of the Kingdom, I was curious if there were any alternate endings of any sort (there were not any really). Then I found this and was reminded why game journalists are so despised.
"Boo hoo, this fantasy game does not have a message that conforms to my faggy libshit politics!"
This is the kind of writer that wishes he was a "real journalist," but could not even hack it as that. So he spews his shit under the guise of being a "game journalist."
Fo real, into the pit they go.
I liked the ending, I had a feeling she would be that dragon based on the color scheme but not till later in the game.
How did you like the game? I thought it was better than BoTW. Still confused how we defeat Gannon in BoTW only for him to have been asleep for thousands of years in TotK.
@Chimi_Chuang_Tzu I very much enjoyed the game. Definitely the sequel I wanted from Breath of the Wild.
I found out she became the dragon from collecting all the Tears early. As for the whole Calamity Ganon and Ganondorf thing, I would like a proper explanation to how that works, but who knows if we will get it. The best explanation I can think of is that some of the power escaped from Ganondorf (while he was sealed) to create another form of Ganon.
Ahh, yah I didn't try that quest yet. Still got plenty left to do, the crafting options are insane.
Saw a random video on how they crafted the open world, worth a watch.
This right here is a direct example of what I am talking about. Not content with his current status of having to write about video games to be a "journalist," he feels the strong need to bring up politics when it is one of the very things you do NOT want to have discussed when you want a break from dwelling on things such as politics.
It's just a game, you pathetic soyboy. It is not supposed to be a deep political commentary. But you just can't not be a faggot for a moment, can you?