Capitalism pits pharma against healthy people. Healthy people don't need pharma.
@nomebullyyou I can't believe Mr. Capitalism won't protect me from my enemies!
Capitalism doesn't "do" anything, it's a system that merely gives people the freedom to vote with their wallets.
If it's more profitable to make healthy people sick and keep them dependent on big pharma products, then that is the fault of the WEAK men who allow it, it's not up to an economic system to shield them.
Rise up, do the thing, if someone is knowingly making you sick, then you give them a terminal disease.
@nomebullyyou Take money out of the equation. If you want obedient slaves, is it in your interest that they're 100% healthy? Or would you gain more by repeatedly poisoning them so they're just strong enough to do their job (and too weak to revolt), but also require your medicine to survive in the long term? This has nothing to do with money or capitalism, let's not use leftist arguments to attack economic freedom.
@Based_Accelerationist So "economic freedom" is always good? Because my argument is specifically against the "economic freedom" to cause public ill and woe. I suppose I'm third position because I think collectivism can function with racial and religious homogeneity. Those are far off pipe dreams but I think steps can be taken towards those ends that would be better investments of time and energy than trying to make every libertarian who wants to fuck 13 year old girls happy.
@Based_Accelerationist And I'm just talking about limited and necessary evil tier collectivisms, like the roads, etc. Generally ogf course I'm considered more right than left by abject blue haired mouth breathing tards.
