@Based_Accelerationist 3 just proves you have huffed too much of something and 2 is just tedium ad tediousness at this point. Okay sure, you're a crying brownoid or a mutt of some kind. Or worse, a truly weak White. Those are the saddest cases. But yeah, you're a time eater at this point. The caffeine novelty of this is fading
@Based_Accelerationist 1 is crazy dumb and who wants individualism to live that badly ffs? So some guy can live by himself playing a instrument he invented by himself in the middle of a cornfield with a goat and a no trespassing sign? Oh no! We have to crash everything into the ground! And again, who gets to decide who's "weak"? You? You deferred to an outside agent of some kind iirc, and I don't trust their definitions either. Your ideas are old and weak and I want them in the gulag yesterday.
@Based_Accelerationist How we have now segued into me supporting elitism is an adventure I do not even want to embark on, captain. But I will have to bid your USS Insinuation along on a mighty bon voyage of individualistic success and prosperity over the elitist family people who do not want either homeless savages roaming around in the skeletons of suburbs or quadrillionaire bankers farming the slave peasantry like cattle and treating Earth like their own private resort. You win, you are right.
@Based_Accelerationist No one really wants a cleansing outside of online toughguy talkers, crackpots, and Talmudists. Most big talkers would be shitting their pants if their faucet stopped working for three days. Individualists as you describe are as rare as coprophiliacs and for the same reasons. Individuals are sitting ducks. Even two people conspiring against a lone wolf have an immediate advantage of covering the other one's sleeping time to recon the target. It looks good on you tho lol
@Based_Accelerationist Anyway, I'll make nice with other nice people who have genetic histories of being able to maintain prosperous nations that are suitable for raising families. If you think you can be a one man country because super tough Darwinian powerhouse proteinshake McBigBalls, you do you, Scooby Doo.
@Based_Accelerationist You didn't think the libertarians trying to argue out of roads being more efficient to own in common was a desperate rejection of collectivism? Didn't that cope a thon go on for years? Is it still ongoing? I have a rich and prosperous 3D life so I miss a lot of deets.
@Based_Accelerationist
But yeah, if I must own things in common to avoid a lifetime of hilariously unnecessary toil, my first question is with whom? Cos if it's with a bunch of nigligent monkeyshit, I'm exercising some economic freedom and opting tf out
@Based_Accelerationist Who gets to decide who's "weak", then? Babies are weak, but I don't want to discourage them.
But I get wanting to get the implosion and reordering going. There's been a hysterical rejection of all collectivism which I think is sort of dumb. And one race the human race is the flat earth of genetics. 50 Nigerians and 50 native Okinawans aren't capable of the same orders of civilization-building. Religious unity helps too, yes.
@Based_Accelerationist And I'm just talking about limited and necessary evil tier collectivisms, like the roads, etc. Generally ogf course I'm considered more right than left by abject blue haired mouth breathing tards.
@Based_Accelerationist So "economic freedom" is always good? Because my argument is specifically against the "economic freedom" to cause public ill and woe. I suppose I'm third position because I think collectivism can function with racial and religious homogeneity. Those are far off pipe dreams but I think steps can be taken towards those ends that would be better investments of time and energy than trying to make every libertarian who wants to fuck 13 year old girls happy.
@cjd Fuentes blew a granny, and I don't mean car trouble. Serious fag bitch shit. Another rumor has Milo screwing this tranny because he wanted to make Fuentes jealous. The alt right is in fine form.
@Shadowman311 National Treasure
New skin for the old ceremony.