Follow

1 Women says women only scholarships are bad

2 Demonstrates why taxpayer funding of science is bad because it is not used for science but to pay corrupt faculty

3 Purpose of faculty at University is not to do research but to get funding that you pretend is research but is not

m.youtube.com/watch?v=LKiBlGDf

My dream died, and now I'm here

Sabine Hossenfelder

· · Web · 4 · 3 · 3

@shortstories This is an order of magnitude larger for environmental science. They've been telling us the world is eminently going to end since the 1960s. If they don't, why would they get money.

@shortstories Everyone knows that academia is BS because they wrap their lips around government cock to get paid. They're whores with research degrees.

"Government Grants" = Compensation for getting skullfucked to skullfuck the unskullfucked.

@shortstories All I could think when watching this woman's sob story is that Einstein developed Relativity in his spare time while working as a patent clerk. I am sorry honey, but the world does not owe you anything and will not automatically pay you to show everyone how smart you are. I had to change my dream job a few times. It is called growing up and trying to find something interesting to do that is also useful to society.

@IcarusWax

So she could have developed important research with no college degree and no job position in a science or engineering field

Also a lot of people think Einstein's fwife wrote the papers and did the math cslculatiins but Einstein got the credit and that Einstein's wife and Einstein Plagiarized other people

Also the length contraction in Special Relativity can have objects collide in 1 reference frame but not another for the same event so special relativity is not true

@IcarusWax

If there was a car racing down a straight race track with a wall a certain distance after the finish line

From the reference frame in which the car is moving but the race track is stationary

The car would shrink in the direction it moves

But from the reference frame in which the car is stationary and the race track is moving

The race track and the distance between the finish line and the wall would shrink in the direction they move

@IcarusWax

When the center of the car & the center of the finish line cross

There could potentially be a collission in one reference frame but not in another reference frame

If the distance from the finish line to the wall and the size of the car and the speed is chosen correctly

This disproves the special relativity

In special relativity

An object is largest in the reference frame it is stationary in and smaller in the direction it is moving in the reference frame it is moving in

@IcarusWax

I should have said some people

Their was a presentation or guest speaker being interviewed about this on Red Ice Radio I found on youtube but youtube banned Red Ice Radio as far as I know

"Also a lot of people think Einstein's fwife wrote the papers and did the math cslculatiins"

Also Einstein divorced his first wife in order to married his biological cousin after that

I would not put much stock in what sabine says, she is a perfect example of what is wrong with scientists in relation to actually doing science, they treat logic as an optional thing instead of the core of their tenant as it should be. Saying gravity warps space instead of bending the path of light is a prime example. We can not do anything to space yet we rely on light to see and it is the basis of all our tech and we can feel it. Logic would dictate that fabric of spacetime is wrong and that light is not massless.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.