Follow

The common public has no access to the historical manuscripts which are claimed to be the evidence of ancient history

· · Web · 1 · 1 · 1

@d0c40r0

So people allegedly find fragments of the old and new testament but the general public Is not allowed to touch the fragments

You can get a Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic Bible complete with a list of manuscript variants but you do not know those were from the actual manuscripts because the genuine public can not handle those manuscripts

And even scholars who can handle them are told stories from a third party about where they were found

Only the person who claims to find them knows

"the general public is not allowed to touch the fragments" yeah man I'm not allowed to go up and start licking the mona lisa
I do understand where you're coming from but the preservation of the texts is of higher importance than letting people physically access them

to the best of my knowledge scans exist and can be fairly easily located

@d0c40r0

If the manuscripts are real then I do not think the general public should handle them to prevent damage

but my point is even the special scholars or technicians that are allowed to handle them do not know that someone did not just create a manuscript tell them they found it somewhere and give it to them

Only the person who claims to have found the manuscript knows and only then if someone else did not plant it for them to find

Not just Bible or Quran manuscripts but all of them

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.