leftoids/governments talk about the far right in a way that reminds me of the academic description of the voting policy relationship in electoral dictatorships
voting against the guy the dictator is being far right, bad policies means more people vote against the dictator amd that its time to correct course
nit that they vote for anything but against, theyre being crazy and racist clearly conditions are bad
also the social effects of being far right are beginning to remind me of electoral dictatorships, the protest votes have weight because theyre are economic and social consequences incurred on those who vote against the dictator, and while its not wholly applied being against the government now has real consequences
voting against the guy the dictator is being far right, bad policies means more people vote against the dictator amd that its time to correct course
nit that they vote for anything but against, theyre being crazy and racist clearly conditions are bad
also the social effects of being far right are beginning to remind me of electoral dictatorships, the protest votes have weight because theyre are economic and social consequences incurred on those who vote against the dictator, and while its not wholly applied being against the government now has real consequences
Follow
Can you explain it in a simpler manner that is easier to understand?
the way modern governments talk about the far right
and the way the democratic mechanism of electoral dictatorships(course correction based on popularity) works
sounded similar to me, they treat it as and anger/desperation response and not actually reasoned political actions