@nugger @Eiregoat @confederatehobo @Frondeur Main issue is the concrete has to be a certain thickness to protect the underlying steel from atmospheric oxygen so it's not good for statues
@LivingSpaceStudios @confederatehobo @Eiregoat @Frondeur @Groomschild @nugger
What I want to know is are these unstable pieces of art buildings that people go inside of or close enough to destroy people or important things if they fall down and are they getting taxpayer subsidies or is this a tool to funnel money
If someone builds a piece of artwork through their own honest hard work, it falls down & nobody gets hurt and nothing important gets damaged I do not care
& pyramids are over-rated
@LivingSpaceStudios @confederatehobo @Eiregoat @Frondeur @Groomschild @nugger
Will if they are building unstable buildings to show how good they are at art and yet spending extra money that could be used to provide better facilities for people living in the building and also risk tenant lives then that is bad
Most large scale landlords might be evil people who made a corrupt deal with the fractional reserve bankers and do not care about their tenants life or well being
Image 1 is the Habit 67, which is an actual apartment block that people live in.
Image 2 is the Boston University Center for Computing & Data Sciences, which is a university building for computer science students.
Image 3 is some random apartment blocks in Russia.
Image 4 is a Tesco grocery store in Woolwich, London.