It's breathtaking to see what kind of claims circulate on the internet without a shred of evidence 🙄🤦♂️
it does not state the mars dust contains oxygen only that it can be converted into it
You cannot "convert" mars dust into oxygen 🤣🤣🤣
You could EXTRACT oxygen from Mars dust if it CONTAINED oxygen.
Unless you want to postulate that fungi can generate the power of a supernova to convert atoms ...
You could EXTRACT oxygen from Mars dust if it CONTAINED oxygen.
Unless you want to postulate that fungi can generate the power of a supernova to convert atoms ...
@[email protected] You probably believe that the earth is flat and that the moon landing was fake 🙄🤦♂️
You obviously don't have a scientific background and do not understand what was technically possible, in the 1960s.
I actually watched the moon landing and I was super interested in high tech. I watched the emergence of hard- and software.
It was materially IMPOSSIBLE to record videos of more than 30 seconds, back then, so it all had to be live-streamed.
There was no CGI. There was no "photoshop". The largest working memory on a mainframe was 8 MB.
They brought back fantastic photos in extremely high resolution from a Hasselblad camera - from space and the moon's surface.
NVidia demonstrated that it was IMPOSSIBLE to get the lighting right without a full ray tracing simulation, which they could not have performed, back then. Everything on those images is EXACTLY as it would have to be if they actually were on the moon & could not have been simulated.
https://www.minds.com/SMetzeler/blog/the-moon-landing-hoax-must-die-1108930902011445248
You obviously don't have a scientific background and do not understand what was technically possible, in the 1960s.
I actually watched the moon landing and I was super interested in high tech. I watched the emergence of hard- and software.
It was materially IMPOSSIBLE to record videos of more than 30 seconds, back then, so it all had to be live-streamed.
There was no CGI. There was no "photoshop". The largest working memory on a mainframe was 8 MB.
They brought back fantastic photos in extremely high resolution from a Hasselblad camera - from space and the moon's surface.
NVidia demonstrated that it was IMPOSSIBLE to get the lighting right without a full ray tracing simulation, which they could not have performed, back then. Everything on those images is EXACTLY as it would have to be if they actually were on the moon & could not have been simulated.
https://www.minds.com/SMetzeler/blog/the-moon-landing-hoax-must-die-1108930902011445248
Follow
In the NASA video footage they provide on youtube at approximately 1068 seconds
They say
CBS news simulation
