Even when explaining the Jews - the Jews WROTE THE OLD TESTAMENT.
Do you not think it's reasonable to ask where they got this information and how they decided upon it?
But they never look into how the Jews do things. And consider it all "divine" when it's not. It was a bunch of Jews sitting around arguing until they all decided someone had won the argument. The entire jewish religion starts out with Abraham arguing with god and "winning the argument".
This is the basis for their whole religion - this is your old testament. It has nothing to do with divine beings from the sky.
Even if it were true that the OT were ahistorical (a claim I highly doubt), it misses the point entirely.
The OT was written centuries before the Incarnation of Christ, and was positively stuffed with Messianic Prophecy that wasn’t fulfilled until hundreds of years after all the authors had died. No merely-human agency at any level could possibly pull that off. That’s its actual significance
That's like saying "That last domino can't possible fall just because someone pushes over the first domino."
That’s not at all what it’s like; nobody human could possibly have steered events like the God-Man being born in a specific town, to a specific virgin. One doesn’t get to decide things like that about their own birth.
Yeah I don’t know what to tell you. Shepherds and peasants and fishermen don’t really have a lot of ability to steer the sorts of narratives that rulers pay to have written down
Pretty sure we’re talking past each other; I’m referring to OT Messianic Prophecy
So you might want to get interested in how they decided what was in the Torah, and what they mean by "God"
It got moved across most of asia for thousands of years.
That anthropologist guy was constantly going on about it appearing in pre-history.
The Hindu religion alone is 5000 years old dude. They simply have different names for the same thing.
This system along with the symbols and chakras and sex magic, are all contained in religions from 5000 years onwards.
“wow so Eve knew not to eat from the tree, but then did and grew ashamed, so instead chose to make sure Adam felt the same shame? she sounds just like the snake!”
@A_Small_Dog @shortstories @Dagnar @PodunkPotato @zeke @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Jewpacabra @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @KingOfWhiteAmerica @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn Well I would think that since Adam was nearby he should have told her to not do that since a man should protect, so maybe there is something to that?
@Sovereign @Dagnar @PodunkPotato @zeke @A_Small_Dog @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Jewpacabra @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @KingOfWhiteAmerica @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn
So are you saying that if Eve ate a poisoned fruit than Adam should have tried to make her vomit up the fruit to protect her from food poisoning?
Had Adam done his job, and corrected Eve, Death would not have entered the entire world at that time.
The correct meaning of Genesis is made explicitly clear in the New Testament. It’s not my problem if others choose to reject that; but answers certainly exist and are available to us.
It obviously doesn’t matter to Christians whether people outside The Faith approve of NT hermeneutics 😂
Though I will say, a hard line like that is easier to work with than a thousand slippery heresies that almost sound right.
Got me 😂
Naw jk - he’s kind of a wanker, even if he’s technically right about most things
I’m being a bit uncharitable saying he’s a bit of a wanker; but my point is I’m not actually him - even if, at times, I inadvertently say some things the same way he probably would 😂
Tbh I’m pretty sure he stonewalled me because I’m not in Communion with his Church; it’d be easy to be bitter and shitty about it but I do get it - so it’s forgivable 🙏🏻
Not sure what you’re referring to, my man
@PodunkPotato @Dagnar @Sovereign @zeke @A_Small_Dog @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Jewpacabra @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @KingOfWhiteAmerica @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn @Yesterday
Ultrajectine Sedevacantist or Ultramontane Sedevacantist?
We've got front row seats to a worldwide revolution, and I think we all know that it's not for the better.
That's never happened before, but the prophetic books of the Bible forecasted it, and everything is lining up accordingly.
🇺🇸 
🇷🇺 :confederate_flag: 
I don’t know anything about what you’re talking about but I’m honestly surprised more people don’t think Francis and Leo are fraudulently elected.
I think that’s abundantly obvious; he got thrown for a loop and wasn’t mentally prepared for the whole idea of what he’d have to do to get a handle on everything.
There are some obvious key distinctions, but I see a good deal of overlap between Benedict XVI and Richard Nixon.
Theoretically, Nixon actually had the power to declare National Emergency Powers, round up and arrest every jew and traitor, and have them executed as hostile foreign enemy agents - and ordered the Executive in all the States to do the same. There was no guarantee of success, and the bloodshed would have been extreme. But he clearly wasn’t Genghis Khan; he went in with Faith in the American Way of democracy and will of the people through electoral process and all that jazz. Big part of why he got elected in the first place.
While I don’t know the exact extent of powers delegated to the Pope, I imagine he could theoretically have done the same or similar, vis-a-vis the Swiss Guard locally, and friendly State actors and agents throughout Western Christendom. The bloodshed probably would have been even greater than is the case, with Nixon. But he wasn’t that kind of guy. Honestly, I don’t know for certain if that was actually ever on the table for Benedict XVI. But intuitively I sense every TradCat I ever met would gladly have cooperated.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @Dagnar @PodunkPotato @Sovereign @zeke @A_Small_Dog @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Jewpacabra @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn @Yesterday
Antipope John Paul 2 and the antipopes that follpw him would never support arresting Kikes
Any Pope after John Paul 2 that has not declared John Paul 2 aj antipope is an antipope
John Paul 2 not merely failed to support arresting Kikes but praised how great the kike religion is
My man, I don’t think there’s been a legit Bishop of Rome since the 11th Century.
That being said, despite being Orthodox I’m a Western Man; and I value the Papal Church and its central role and sacrifices in my native ancestral civilization. And from that perspective, it appears to me that Benedict XVI represented an authentic pendulum swing back to Tradition - which was precisely why they forced him out.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @Dagnar @PodunkPotato @Sovereign @zeke @A_Small_Dog @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Jewpacabra @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn @Yesterday
Fun Fact Moses Maimonides lived closer in time to the Split between Eastern Orthodox and Rome than to Muhammad, Jesus or the Old Testament Moses
Making so called Orthodox Judaism newer than Christianity and Islam
I don’t know how you figure the East-West Schism defines the start date for Christianity 
Nvm I misread it 😂
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @Dagnar @PodunkPotato @Sovereign @zeke @A_Small_Dog @GoonPatrol @James_Dixon @Jewpacabra @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @multiversal_gangstalker @thatfightnerd @thefinn @Yesterday
I am saying that Orthodox Judaism is so new that Christianity already had multiple schisms before it started
Agreed; yeah it’s got nothing to do with Biblical Israel aside from whatever they need to say to dupe gullible goyim
I assume you mean Urban II 
He’s typically regarded as being legit, in that tentative Communion had been restored by that point in spite of being post-Schism. I regard him as such
And, he’s one of history’s best rulers so no dispute
The 1054 break is sort of a easy-placeholder that fails to convey the complexity of the situation 😆
I’m definitely more in that first camp 😅
