I still think the evil things that Kikes do are taught by Kikes who warp the minds of humans turning them into Kikes
But I was thinking more about why Kikes would harm their host even when it does not benefit Kikes
Why would that cultural practice or if I am wrong and it is genetic why would genes that cause that cultural practice continue to be passed on when they could extract more resources out of the host by exploiting the host bjt not harming the host
1 of 2
So according to evolutionary theory we are not comparing whether or not a DNA sequence provides better reproduction than an ideal theoritical code but only comparing the codes that happened to appear by random chance
So if among a subspecies of a species a code that happened to cause more harm to outsiders with no benefit never competed against a code that did not cause harm to outsiders unless there was a benefit there would be no method to select for the code that harms the host less
2 of 2
Diseases that kill their host faster have less opportunity to reproduce
If leeches instantly killed their host instead of letting their host live will extracting blood they would be called a predator instead of a parasite and leeches would be less succesful at survival to reproduce more leeches if they did not get more blood killing per time by the host then by letting the host live
@shortstories
It was explained in the parable of the scorpion and the frog. It's their nature: parasites always act as parasites.