Follow

Why does University attendance lower the birth rate for women

Which of the four is the best explanation of the factor or combination of factors with the greatest influence to lower birth rates in women

If you do not believe it lowers birth rates in women then do not vote

I was limited to four options

· · Web · 5 · 1 · 2

@shortstories This is dumb. This isn't a matter of beliefs. You can ask woman and they'll tell you. Roleplaying as a man with boobs is more preferable, than being limited to exist in the female reality. Many woman would happily gender swap to be a man, just to get out of dealing with female biology. Giving birth is the peak of this experience, especially when they experience complications. Human reproduction is a very flawed and dangerous system.

Truth here. Honestly, it's actually been made MORE dangerous & worse by a lot of modern practices (& diet, etc.), which further reinforces this fear.
@shortstories Its two things. By the time they are through school and established in their career they are nearly through their fertile period and hypergamy, there just arent enough 6'2" billionaire werewolves to go around

@Escoffier @UnCL3

Someone needs to make a

Young Adult Fiction Book called Not Enough Billionairre Werewolves

>Someone needs to make a Young Adult Fiction Book called Not Enough Billionairre Werewolves

Then send it to the crew at whatever clips and see what the foids do.
Two of the strongest predictors of how many responses a man’s online dating profile receives are years of formal education and income. A controlled experiment holding all other factors constant found that women were 91 percent more likely to hit the “like” button for a man with a master’s degree than a bachelor’s. In that minority of marriages where the wife has enjoyed more formal education than her husband, the husband almost always (93 percent of the time) earns more money. If a man trails a woman in both education and income, his chances of finding acceptance from her approach zero. Men looking for a woman, on the other hand, care far less about either education or real or potential earnings.

From the point of view of economic rationality, a highly credentialed, high-earning woman should have less need of finding those same traits in a husband. But women’s sexual instinct does not obey the principle of economic rationality: the more a woman has achieved herself, the greater the stress she places on finding a mate of higher achievement still. This means, of course, that the dramatic expansion in academic and professional opportunities for women in recent decades has led to proportionately massive female loneliness and sexual frustration.
Yes, if we're talking into the context of just casual dating and not marriage, which I argued for in aforemention post.
Every single clip I've seen on line as a "wish list" for foids, number one is income, #2 is "over 6 feet tall".
Just make them poor, and you'll see fertility&birth rates and marriages skyrocketing even eclipsing the Boomer period.
If you give women UBI, they have less children. If you give their husbands UBI, they have more children.

Caveats: Study focused on low-income women and the experiment lasted two years; possible (but unlikely) that long-term fertility effects could differ from these results.

@shortstories I go with Jordan Peterson on this one. Women are always looking for someone better than them who can contribute to the relationship and take care of them when they are vulnerable during pregnancy.

By going through university, the pool of "high status" males shrinks, and therefore fertility plummets.

You forgot economic independence/sometimes out-earning partners, but that might fall under being taught lies (inflated, fake economy).
@GoyGirl @shortstories I think it does
> money = value

Just factually isn't, it's a medium of exchange. Sure looks the same though if one doesn't know better.
Because you're spending your days in class and your nights doing homework during your prime pairing years.

Men have the same problem a lot of the time -- a lot of engineers, doctors, and lawyers take some time spinning up on the runway with clear skies in front of them because they spent those formative years dedicated to their craft instead of meeting women. The big difference would be that humanity evolved with men being intrinsically worthless and so it's built in that they build worth later.

Imagine the brutality of a nihilistic postmodern world that says there is no such thing as worth. No wonder half of people will never breed.
@sj_zero @shortstories

I also think that in university you either are there to sleep around or youre there to get a degree to start a career. For people that I know (especially the ones that happen to be dating) getting into a relationship was never a primary goal. In the case of those who ended up finding it, it was more of a coincidence than a deliberate effort

I could also point out that the lowering birthrate seems to be a result of the cultural view on it; that its a detriment, either rising costs of raising a family, loss of personal agency, or other, i think as a society we value rearing families less.
I spent college in the basement so I can't speak to your first point, but for your second, I totally agree. Many lies have been told to me, and "having kids will make you miserable" is the second greatest among them.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.