It's almost perfect, but the video endorses herd morality uses stupid oversimplified arguments to say that morality is objective. I can tell instantly that he is a pro stability/tradition Absolutist guy, and he later confirms this by endorsing monarchy.
I love how the Absolutist Right can correctly call out Equality on it's bullshit all day, but trip at the finish line and endorse monarchy and herd morality. 1/3
The other virtues are equally unobjective, and THAT is the problem with saying morality is objective because of virtue, because virtue isn't objective either.
What the video endorses is herd morality, which is Christian morality, which is based on God, which of course isn't any more objective than the Aztec's morality which includes human sacrifice, based on their own God.
Watch this video debunking the moral argument for God by Anticitizen X: https://youtu.be/DDi7_4BcvTg 3/3
It talks about how equality is bad but people should be judged based on individual virtue, but if you look at a list of Aristotelian virtues, they're not objective at all.
They are: wisdom, justice, fortitude, courage, liberality, magnificence, magnanimity, and temperance.
Simply take justice. If justice were objective, then we wouldn't need judges or juries. The evidence would be submitted into a AI program which would always determine the just sentence, but it isn't because it isn't. 2/3