“Why think for myself when daddy destiny can do my thinking for me” - NPC @Tfmonkey
@Pain66 If I roles were reversed I could easily do the same to anyone making a positive claim. It's as simple as dismissing their arguements and demanding sources, and subsequently dismissing their sources, until they quit.
That's it. There's nothing hard about it. It's just a matter of dismissing and demanding until the other person tells you to go fuck yourself.
I told Alex I didn't want to debate because I hate these annoying tactics, hence why I didn't have an encyclopedia of sources.
@Tfmonkey @Pain66 @Tfmonkey @Pain66 Absolutely. It's easy to poke holes in someone's political philosophy, predictions, or their politics in general. There is no system without some corruption or unfavorable outcomes. Monkey was in the position of making claims, not Destiny, so Destiny didn't have to defend anything.
He also does the argument from incredulity dismissal. "Do you really believe that? You don't think these others things matter in this super complex system?"
He also does the argument from incredulity dismissal. "Do you really believe that? You don't think these others things matter in this super complex system?"
Follow
@ButtWorldsMan @Pain66 @Tfmonkey
He used that a lot, the Ridicule Tactic.
