‘Disruptive’ science has declined — and no one knows why
The proportion of publications that send a field in a new direction has plummeted over the last half-century.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230104165758/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04577-5
Plenty of people know why but they were banned from publishing why
Pulling on that thread unravels a whole story around scientific corruption that eventually brings in ALL the conspiracy theories.
Epstein was just one of the players involved at a high level in the scientific community. It gets wilder than that.
My answer was going to be much more mellow than that
Focusing around getting University job positions based on how many articles you publish
And peer Review Journals being gatekeepers of orthodoxy
Plus an abandonment of the type of scientific method used by previous generations of scientists involving a mathematical model with predictable output for a specified input that can be tested replaced with statistical significance testing with no predicted output
Well sheeeit. If that's all your after then have a couple of free memes on me.
You could write a paper on Newton's tiddie cradle, I'll partner up. It'll be fun.
You do that bit, I'll audition the skanks with big tiddies. It's a deal.
Haha, that abstract is hilarious. Our tax dollars, ladies and gents.
@UncleIroh
Women's Preferences for ***** Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models
Nicole Prause,# 1 ,* Jaymie Park, 1 , ‡ Shannon Leung, 1 , ‡ and Geoffrey Miller# 2
Heather Hoffmann, Editor
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558040/
https://web.archive.org/web/20240610173042/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558040/
The world must know at taxpayer expense
Haptic means sense of touch