I have a genuine question: In a world fully connected where cultural and national boundaries sexist but travel is for the most part free, and immigration between countries is exclusive and total, meaning if you go to X country you adopt X culture, wouldn't humanity tend to become a single race of mutts?
From the perspective of genetic fitness, wouldn't a mutt be the most adaptable to the greatest number of situations as compared to one specific subspecies?
@DoubleD Here are my initial thoughts. Unfortunately, humans aren't like dogs, where instinct can carry you a long way. Since IQ is very real and a better survival mechanism than just survival instinct (some humans don't even have that), I'd say that the ideal human is bred primarily for intelligence. The most intelligent of our people also tend to fill in the blanks of weaknesses, including gaining physical brawn, but the reverse is rarely true.
IQ growth > evened-out, middle-ground average
@RoninGrey @DoubleD @Mike_Microwave
I love this video I watched years ago. It fits perfectly to this discussion, worth watching.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJzJtm7OfdQ
