Who really knows how MRNA works? We're at a point in understanding biology, where we're like a kid who can take apart a radio... and can kinda see which part might do what, but we can't put it back together.
Anyway, I don't think we had the last of the sudden heart attack dance parties. 🤔
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/actor-mike-heslin-dies-30-151535493.html
It's a slowburn genocide at this point.
I did a biology lab in high school where they claimed to split DNA and then sort it into sections by molecular length where the sections with longer molecular length are heavier and do not travel as far under electrophoresis if I remember correctly
Thinking back on the day has got me to start to doubt that we really know how to do DNA testing or that we really knew how to do DNA testing as a society when I was in high school
I think a lot of the DNA test results were fake
Back then, we still had the concept of junk DNA which essentially discounted large sections of DNA as redundant based on nothing more than a lack of understanding.
We've now discarded that idea since coming to the understanding that DNA is more informationally dense than we had thought. Junk DNA is bullshit.
If they were ignoring junk DNA when testing to compare two samples to see if they were from the same individual or two different individuals
Then they might have had a lot of incorrect results where they claimed someone's DNA matched another person's DNA when it did not
I think there are probably a lot of men who got found guilty on the basis of DNA who were not guilty in the past
I do not know if this problem continues today but it would not surprise me if it does
Computational bioinformatics and gentic analysis is an area where AI is actually useful.
Human analysis cannot compare to what's possible with narrow AI. It has the advantage of being able to recognize patterns and perform variant detection in information-dense data which makes it perfect for that field.
I am going to guess that they did not use that type of analysis when a bunch of males got sent to jail based on DNA and that a lot of them are not guilty
The big problem here is suppression of results. How much is being deliberately withheld?
Peer review and once-respected publishers like Nature are now captured and compromised.
Biology is now not only under a national security blanket, it's also ideologically captured and politically weaponized against domestic populations.
It's all asshoe. The way I see it, our only hope is that BRICS defeats this bullshit and their scientists publish suppressed science.
I think even if old articles were not censored that the methods of old articles were compromised
I think a big problem with the peer review process is their obsession with statistical significance testing and not showing the original data that they used to get the conclusion from the statistical significance testing results
For example it is common to show the mean, standard deviation and sample size of the data without showing the data they calculated the mean from
That's dishonest whichever way you look at it, but it doesn't stop there.
Definition: The scientific method is a systematic approach to discovering and understanding the natural world through observation, experimentation, and theoretical explanation.
All of that has been gamed and is well documented. Eric Weinstein talks about this alot.
e.g. He and his wife's work on statisitcal economics proves the lie about CPI fuckery. It's all ideological.
@shortstories @YoMomz
Consumer Price Index. Just go and look it up, he's talked about it a ton.