She's uniquely retarded; the exchange was:
Anderson Cooper asked her, "If it's not possible to codify [Roe v. Waid] in the House, what do you do?"
And she answer with "I think we need to take a look at the filibuster." The filibuster is only used in the Senate, you can't filibuster in the House...
This bitch was a sitting Senator for FOUR YEARS, how she not know this?
RT: https://hell.twtr.plus/objects/7ea64d57-9752-4278-bba0-b3aa9d86cf1f
Anderson Cooper asked her, "If it's not possible to codify [Roe v. Waid] in the House, what do you do?"
And she answer with "I think we need to take a look at the filibuster." The filibuster is only used in the Senate, you can't filibuster in the House...
This bitch was a sitting Senator for FOUR YEARS, how she not know this?
RT: https://hell.twtr.plus/objects/7ea64d57-9752-4278-bba0-b3aa9d86cf1f
There are the rules on the books and then there is what they actually do in practice
For example the President is not supposed to make laws
But Presidents promise laws like Obama Care and the Congress does not seem to say it is none of your business we will make our own decision President but go along with what the President suggests if they are of the same political party
Presidents have started wars even though only Congress is supposed to have that authority
@shortstories @Breaking911 When have you seen a US representative fillibuster on the floor of the house? The House has set time limits so a person couldn't stall and all you need is a simple majority for procedures and bills to pass.
Follow
But if the people choose to ignore the time limits then the time limits will be ignored
@shortstories @Breaking911 They don't.
My suspicion at this point is that if Kamala Harris wants a rule to be broken then it will be broken
