Anderson Cooper asked her, "If it's not possible to codify [Roe v. Waid] in the House, what do you do?"
And she answer with "I think we need to take a look at the filibuster." The filibuster is only used in the Senate, you can't filibuster in the House...
This bitch was a sitting Senator for FOUR YEARS, how she not know this?
RT: https://hell.twtr.plus/objects/7ea64d57-9752-4278-bba0-b3aa9d86cf1f
There are the rules on the books and then there is what they actually do in practice
For example the President is not supposed to make laws
But Presidents promise laws like Obama Care and the Congress does not seem to say it is none of your business we will make our own decision President but go along with what the President suggests if they are of the same political party
Presidents have started wars even though only Congress is supposed to have that authority
Also the Congress and President are most likely fake and played by actors written by a script writer in advance in my opinion
The debates are most likely prescripted like people claim about WWE wrestling matches
But if the people choose to ignore the time limits then the time limits will be ignored
My suspicion at this point is that if Kamala Harris wants a rule to be broken then it will be broken
@Bad_Banner @Breaking911
If you are right that the house is not supposed to do filibusters that does not mean that they will not try to do it and if it works because most of the house do not prevent it then it will work even if it does go against the written rules as you claim
If they simply let each other talk a long time and the others do nothing to prevent the vote delay then the vote will be delayed whether or not they are supposed to do it that way according to the book