@Humpleupagus @freepatriot @MasterSimper
Anomie is the absence of laws
Anarchy is the absence of rulers
Rulers make excuses for breaking rules by maintaining a monopoly on breaking the rules that they say other people should keep
@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot
If a sovereign can not break rules then how can one sovereign punish another sovereign for breaking rules without a worldwide government?
Is it legal for the one sovereign to punish the other sovereign?
If it is not legal then you have international anarchy
If it is legal for one sovereign to punish another sovereign for breaking rules then a sovereign can break rules
@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot
"In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty"
"International relations generally does not understand "anarchy" as signifying a world in chaos, disorder, or conflict; rather, it is possible for ordered relations between states to be maintained in an anarchic international system.[1]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy_(international_relations)
@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot
If a sovereign can not break rules then one sovereign can not prosecute another sovereign for war crimes nor would there be wars between one sovereign and another sovereign in response to rules that one sovereign said the other sovereign broke
@7235c54512c28918a4dcb0d47aa48709feef5c4be45e85f5672cdc4a9a32a871 @Humpleupagus @freepatriot @MasterSimper @koropokkur
The Hague Congress is famous for the expulsion of the anarchist Mikhail Bakunin for clashing with Karl Marx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Congress_(1872)
Bakunin made a lot of predictions about what would happen if Marxism was implemented
Many things similar to what Bakunin said would happen in Marxism was implemented later happened in the Soviet Union
@fbe5e80ec8db5c439e2582d5799d25e2fe8b958b1edf595a173ae1c8aaf46077 @7235c54512c28918a4dcb0d47aa48709feef5c4be45e85f5672cdc4a9a32a871 @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @koropokkur @freepatriot
If Bakunin implemented the type of Anarchist ( allegedly left ) economics he proposed would he have lost the excess wealth his noble family had compared to poorer families in order to help other families that are poorer than his?
I am possibly wrongly assuming he came from a rich family
furthest left is atheism/marxism which wants total government rule because the state has replaced God.
@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot @7235c54512c28918a4dcb0d47aa48709feef5c4be45e85f5672cdc4a9a32a871
If you want an explanation about what right and left means then Ryan Faulk and Keith Preston explained this well
The definition of left and right has changed over the years
Keith Preston is the very best authority I know of involving the different schools of thought that labeled themselves as Anarchist
Anarchist schools of thought can be labeled as either left or right
@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot @7235c54512c28918a4dcb0d47aa48709feef5c4be45e85f5672cdc4a9a32a871
Here is a video of Ryan Faulk explaining how the definition of left and right changes over time.
Also Antifa call themselves anarchists but a lot of them are government employees and some of them might call themselves anarchists to give anarchy a bad name so people will stay loyal to the government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeaxkDKLvyo
Left and Right
AllNationsParty
Youtube
>has his dick in a catboi
You also make a severe logical mistake by entailing that a sovereign can break rules. A sovereign cannot. This is law 101. The sovereign is itself not bound by laws.