RT: https://nicecrew.digital/objects/4bb5c834-fa23-4231-a649-3708e05d1670
But, I've engaged with this discussion as much as it made sense to.
Of course, in this Jewed out Satanic hellhole, the entire discussion of lowering the age of consent would not be had with good intent, so I wouldn't support lowering it without getting rid of the Jews. (My understanding, without looking it up, is it would not need to be lowered at all to reach 16 in many cases, both here and abroad, but I don't care to look it up.)
The whole "you're a pedophile" thing for being attracted to a sexually mature female is retarded. It could hardly be argued if more women were becoming committed wives at 14 and starting to have kids, we would not, in fact, get more children being born. The whole stigma just conveniently happens to result in fewer children being born.
The "you want to fuck kids" line is just making a cheap shot with ill intent about a discussion that deserves to be had about why "we" decided having kids in the prime of fertility was a bad idea.
@DailyStormerDigest @transgrammaractivist @doctorsex
If we say it is not legal to marry until X years old then someone will say it is wrong to date or court or talk to someone at X - 1 years old
If you have to court or talk to or date someone for at least 1 year before marrying them
Then whatever marriage age you set as X results in people not marrying until X + 1 years old
The only solution is to officially legalize courting at a younger age than the official legal age of marriage
Either way, trying to implement a law like that without first making the cultural changes to bring back courtship and the associated social infrastructure to support it is literally putting the cart before the horse
The women at 16
This is like saying murder laws shouldn't exist because people still get killed
@doctorsex @transgrammaractivist @Evil_Bender @DailyStormerDigest
An 18 year old man dating a 16 year old woman is usually bad
The age gap should usually be much large if the man has had enough time to develop skills & resources to support a family in our current society
The man usually should be at least 23 years old
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/online-dating-out-of-your-league/567083/
"A massive new study of online dating finds that everyone dates aspirationally—and that a woman’s desirability peaks 32 years before a man’s does."
@doctorsex @transgrammaractivist @Evil_Bender @DailyStormerDigest
What kind of high paying job can an 18 year old man get? How much saved money would an 18 year old man have? What kind of skills at getting resources would an 18 year old man have?
Child labour laws have delayed the age at which men have working skills. Most men do not know how to farm their own food anymore. The prices of property have sky rocketed due fractional reserve lending. Property tax makes farming not affordable.
@doctorsex @transgrammaractivist @Evil_Bender @DailyStormerDigest
Blue collar route to money or wealth -> Take many years learning a skill
White collar route to money -> Take many years learning a college degree
An 18 year old man simply does not qualify for these things because the starting point to learning a skill or getting a college degree is usually at 18 because most men are not fortunate enough to have parents teach them the family business blue collar skill before they are 18
@doctorsex @transgrammaractivist @Evil_Bender @DailyStormerDigest
If there are two societies that rebuild the infrastructure of society but one has a lower age of legal marriage than the other then I would suggest the one with the lower age of legal marriage will have higher birth rate and defeat the other society up to a point.
Lowering the legal age of marriage below a certain number will no longer raise the birth rate
Muslims & Jews have a lower legal age of marriage than "Christians"
@doctorsex @transgrammaractivist @Evil_Bender @DailyStormerDigest
Let's say in the U.S.A. and Europe White people and Christians and Atheists are not allowed to marry until 18 or older
But Muslims and Jews continue to allow marriage at 12 or even younger
The Muslims and Jews will continue to have a higher population growth rate per capita
If a population has the same average number of children at a younger average age than that population growth rate will be higher
Firstly, 18 only really exists as a barrier in America. And even then, you still have romeo and juliet laws, which do allow for marriage at a lower ages. So, off the bat, that's kind of not really the case.
>But Muslims and Jews continue to allow marriage at 12 or even younger
This is something that really only happens in orthodox jewish communities in Israel, so we're talking about a minority of a minority here. Re: muslims- a majority of muslims are Sunni, which is fairly liberal. The ones that do come to the West liberalize within a generation or two- this puts the birthrate more on par with that of the native population.
As far as the "twelve" number, I mean, ok, I guess, but understand that at 14 and below you're talking about higher and higher chances of pregnancy being a very dangerous thing for both the mother and the child. This continues the further down you go from ~16-18.
This is stuff that, if you're not considering or at least acknowledging, just makes it sound like you want to fuck 12 year olds.
The assertion that lower legal age of marriage alone is what solves fertility is self-evidently wrong, as romeo and juliet laws already allow for young marriage and yet fertility is not improved.
So why do insist on putting the cart ahead of the horse?