@sardonicsmile

Some people think Nuclear bombs are not real and that they just used more or bigger conventional bombs than usual plus chemical warfare involving mustard gas or other chemical weapons on Japan

the problem with unraveling this shit is that we only have the aggressor nation's data "UK America and other minors"

@Tadg_macNuadat @sardonicsmile

There is also the data from the nation claiming to be the victim which is Japan but some of the people that believe this claim Japan made a deal to claim it was really nuked in exchange for United States aid in rebuilding Japan

right right. I'm not feeding into any side but there is data from Vietnam regarding defoliage agents and how those affected the Americans there fighting their illegitimate war and the denizens. You'd think that radiation poisoning would have caused downstream problems for the Japs. And maybe it did. Nice peopole probably have more info. But I'm as inclined to believe the MOAB/dresden theories as I am the nuke. What do you think?
Follow

@Tadg_macNuadat @sardonicsmile

I think that either way the powers that be can hurt a lot of people in a large geographical area and in a small amount of time

Also I think that instead of paying to guard nuclear waste and not using it we should use it in nuclear power plants and then guard the nuclear power plants

Fundamentally we need to socially influence the military members to change sides to defend the citizens from the so called governments

Then we will not have to worry about nukes

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0
I guess if the question of nukes is do they do what they're purported to do then, no we don't have to worry about their use because the use of them would impact that perpetrators of such weapons.

You're moving around a bit, but three mile, chernobyl, and fujishima don't have any impact on my life as far as I know.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.