If the Kikes wrote the new testament then why didn't the Kikes make all Kikes in the new testament to be the good guys instead of making people of the Kike religion the bad guys in the new testament who are persecuting the Christians whether the Christians are of Gentile or Israelite ancestry
Why didn't they make Jesus followers and the Pharisees followers best friends in the New Testament
they wrote themselves as the ones who instigated the killing of the guy they want you to praise as Lord, who they hate, truly a genius work of subversion. far beyond my comprehension.
@reallyangry @shortstories @LudditeMan
1 Christianity started as an offshoot of Judaism in Israel and failed to subvert the Jews, so they had to sell it to the goy, while still desiring to take over Israel. They have to paint Jews as fallen and only those who convert can be saved.
2 If they don't paint the Jews as fallen/bad for killing the messiah, then God won't abandon them and the goy can never be the new chosen.
3 In order to lead the opposition, you need to make it seem it opposes you.
@reallyangry @shortstories @LudditeMan
It becomes rather obvious when you see that the root of Christianity is Judaism, but changed to subvert the goyim. It's an eye for an eye, for the Jew. It's turn the other cheek for you. It's racial supremacy for them, but "we're all brothers under Christ". They're taught to pray for wealth, you're taught the rich don't make it to heaven, etc.
This is what rabbis have believed since at least Maimonides, here's video proof:
https://x.com/seethroughit2/status/1888641300305523018
@Based_Accelerationist @reallyangry @LudditeMan
"This is what rabbis have believed since at least Maimonides"
Maimonides was born 1135 AD approximately 1000 years after the alleged death of Jesus around 33 AD
Maimonides is not a good authority on what early Christianity taught or for that matter what early Judaism taught near the time of Christ either
since Orthodox Judaism was based on Maimonides it is more than 1000 years newer than the earliest form of Christianity
@shortstories @reallyangry @LudditeMan Except, Maimonides and the other rabbis' claims about Christianity being a subversion are backed by evidence. One only needs to study the well-documented fall of Rome and read Judeo Christian works such as "The City of God", by Augustine of Hippo, to see that Christianity was a subversion from the start. There's far too much evidence.
It's precisely because of this subversion, that the rabbis are the BEST source of information regarding Christianity.
@Based_Accelerationist @reallyangry @LudditeMan
@RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare
So constantine basically created a State Church that was run on voting and which was not based on the originally intended meaning of New Testament Jesus quotes
Ever since constantine what has been called Christianity has been used to support blind obedience to an authority structure
Constantine's Christisnity with it's majority vote was in direct opposition to Jesus teaching about the narrow way with few that find it
@Based_Accelerationist @reallyangry @LudditeMan @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare
But did constantine claim to have Israelite ancestry?
@shortstories @reallyangry @LudditeMan @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare No idea, he didn't leave many records of his beliefs for us to read.
@shortstories @reallyangry @LudditeMan @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare
Good we're making progress. First Maimonides was a thousand years removed from the death of Jesus, now Constantine is only 270 and we've acknowledged the Church was already a psyop by then.
And how did they gain influence in Rome before Constantine? By promising communism and salvation to the poor, like every Jewish subversive group ever.
Do we need to go further back, to when Jesus celebrated the passover in the first church?