What is sometimes called Evidence based medicine is not necessarily the same as medicine based on scientific principles or scientific models

Evidence based medicine can go contrary to your personal observations and sometimes follows what Robert Jay Lifton called

Doctrine Over Person

In his book on Totalitarianism

A scientific model may have been tested for multiple generations than predictions maybe made as to the effects of a treatment based on the model

But the latest peer review...

The problem with the scientific model is that it no longer looks for difference.

When medicine first started "outliers" were looked at as being different for some reason, and often as evidence of a different disease. Now the disease is presumed "known" and outliers are just placebo effects

@Humpleupagus @shortstories WTF
"problem with scientific model is that it no longer looks for difference" NO, not at all., It seeks the truth through proposed theory, AND THEN TESTS IT AS IF IT WAS WRONG TO DISPROVE IT. There is NOTHING wrong with that. The ONLY problem is politics, power, church, state, USE that model, and SILENCE decent if it doesn't work for them. You are describing "scientific publications" and I strongly suggest you look at who owns them. I spent until I was 30 years old "studying in universities" in the 90s.. I know how "scientists" (in academics) "tune there research to get funding, and don't bring up conflicting evidence" because of funding risks. The problem is, SCIENCE and scientists can NOT survive cancel culture and present facts.

Point in fact.... Kary Mullis.

"Science" was compromised decades ago, (global warming), it's only now when people see culture, media, everything, was compromised the go "science too now" (especially post-Covid). Trust me, they took down the truth in scientific publications DECADES ago... It was one of the first steps (Aaron Swartz knew that, and died for it)