The exploration in Starfield is WORSE than in No Man's Sky. How fucking embarrassing, Todd. Bethesda is an embarrassing company.
https://youtu.be/uABdEe0Zo9c?si=NoKGJ6uPJdWVKL7G
Calls the game a cure to his insomnia. Hey @Tfmonkey look Bethesda came up with a game so boring you'll be snoozing in no time.
@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey Is it Starfield? Is it that bad?
@Lorgar @Tfmonkey It's just a bethesda game with shittier exploration. In skyrim you can run in emptiness but always discover something as you explore, even if it's a repetitive location. In Starfield planets are procedurally generated wastelands with maybe one point of interest if you land in the right spot and the getting to it requires MINUTES worth of running. No vehicles. Only play the vanilla game to see what mods had to fix.
@ButtWorldsMan @Lorgar So just play the Outer Worlds then?
@Tfmonkey @Lorgar Outer Worlds is actually even worse leftist trash, which forever stained the imagine I had Obsidian. That company is dead as far as I'm concerned. New Vegas was the last great game they created.
I would recommend No Man's Sky over Starfield. Did you know that the devs never stopped updating and adding content to that game? It's much more engaging and rich now.
@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey @Lorgar With Outer Worlds, and Cyberpunk I don't understand why they include character creation but no option for a third-person camera. Why spend time on it all when you will never see your character again
@Mike_Microwave @Tfmonkey @Lorgar The narcissism that comes with non-rpgs pretending to be rpgs. At least the non-rpgs Bethesda makes have 3rd person.
