If you've not read "Socialism" by Ludwig von Mises, I would recommend it. In one of the earlier chapters he discusses how the feminist movement has at its heart socialism as a common end.
Additionally, I do not fully agree with some of his conclusions about the potential for female nature to be much more like male nature, but his assessment of the facts are accurate...
I believe that Mises can be forgiven for his mistaken understanding of female nature as an advocate of classical liberalism because at the time (1922), psychoanalysis was brand new, Evolutionary Psychology didn't exist yet, feminism was in phase 1, and its effects were not felt yet: most families unaffected.
I think if he were alive today, he would conclude that MGTOW is a perfectly reasonable reaction to the market and that female empowerment has brought about the dissolution of the family.
I find the claim that Mises said women should be allowed to vote on spending welfare very doubtful, because I doubt he would let anyone vote to allow any welfare spending unless you count working for the government as welfare
I would suspect he would want to limit the government not to provide welfare or only to provide it to government employees
And that he would want to limit what government employees can do to a very narrow set of job titles
@shortstories
He didn't claim that.
@DoubleD
If you forbid everyone including men from voting then you necessarily also forbid women from voting because they are part of the group of everyone
You can support legal gender equality while also opposing voting
Supporting equal rights for people regardless of gender would remove women's extra rights but result in being accused of removing women's rights
Removing women's extra rights would mean no more privileges of being hired based on gender & be closer to traditional gender roles