@Based_Accelerationist I heard someone say recently that these people are really good at doing win/win scenarios. Even if they lose they gain something they want, however small it might be. The more I consider it the more I agree, especially if you see things from a spiritual, longterm perspective.
@Based_Accelerationist @N_Y_SparkyOxCable When did mgtow change from "Men going their own way" to "Men not having kids"?
@egirlyuumimain @Based_Accelerationist @Zeb I think the main point is to be happy without needing a woman to decide your worth. Some guys decide to risk the dating world even, but accepting the risks on their own terms. And some decide to go their own way after having kids and a divorce. Their "way" is to raise the child to be redpilled and not retarded and not put themselves in that situation ever again and hopefully save the next generation from it. Finding worth outside of a woman's approval.
@Zeb It was always part of the package. If "all women are like that" (meaning all women will cheat/divorce/misbehave), if the juice isn't worth the squeeze, if the laws in western countries are too awful to justify marrying or having kids, then... (insert sex doll add).
MGTOW men who have children, almost always had them prior to joining the movement. No matter how you look at it, it's an anti-natalist movement, not because having kids is bad, but because it isn't worth it.
@N_Y_SparkyOxCable Absolutely. The old money always plays the long term game. Stirring up the system too quickly with too much winning is risky, incremental wins and controlling the opposition is the key to their success.
Mgtow doesn't hurt them at this point, it's a net positive. They don't care if white men log off from the system, they're meant to be replaced by migrants and western economies are set to crash by design anyway. What they don't want is for us to go berserk on the way out.