@sardonicsmile the "natural balance" that has fewer men with harems has other consequences this woman has not considered. Civilization is able to be far more advanced when there are more men invested in the system succeeding. Having fewer men means you just don't have the raw numbers for this to be possible. Our current issue is not the total number of men, but men who have a stake in the success. Men who have no wife and kids of their own are not going to be nearly as invested.
@sardonicsmile with a larger number of the men who are unable to have their own woman to pair with, a lot of men have been checking out of the system. You simply will not have men motivated to work hard if they are unable to have a wife of their own to have a family with. The current trend towards soft harems where many women are having out of wedlock children and many men who are left out of the sexual marketplace means we are due for civilizational collapse.
@houseoftolstoy @sardonicsmile The Feminism will last until the only humans that Will remain are isolated tribes in the Congo so humanity will starover from Africa once more.
@VeganMGTOW @houseoftolstoy @sardonicsmile Agreed, men need to have stake and investment in society in order to have a prospering civilization. Civilization needs monogamy, harems only work with male scarcity otherwise you need to control women’s mate choice. I agree with TWRA but in the longterm we need an advancement in technology to overcome the cycle, which is why I favor transhumanism the most.