Joined Dec 2022
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/serial-dine-dash-suspect-facing-180408413.html
This theory that China's undermining the West by sending citizen spies seems reasonable... But it's funny to see the human element at work. This particular spy isn't their best. 😏
But yeah, female entitlement from the land of one-child-policy gender imbalance, meeting Western simpery and asian fetish... leads to this. And wouldn't it be funny, if these sorts of shenanigans leads the CCP to rescind women's rights? 🤔 A man can dream. 🍻
So, a peek into NormieNews made me laugh. It wasn't the subtleties of the markets or anything like that... But this picture... I don't think it conveys what the author meant to convey...
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-goes-ai-genesis-mission-091156131.html
The extremities (hands and feet) would be too delicate for such a construction method, but having extra weight at the extremities (compared to the limbs) might very well result in a doll that acts more lively (think of the chaotic motion of a double pendulum).
Cheap limbs could be constructed of plastic (or Styrofoam) while high end could be aluminum or a spring steel cage, assembled in strips. Spring steel cage could eliminate the possibility of permanent denting.
I think I just had a brilliant idea.
I was listening to the woes of dealing with the dead weight of a sex doll... 🤔 and get this: modular hollow skeletons.
I might post design sketches if there's any interest (Revi? Phil? Love nestle?). But basically, the joints could be universal (hips, knees, shoulders, etc), and the segments between could vary in shape and length. This could significantly reduce weight, rubber material, and decrease development costs for new models.
TFM's stagflationary depression market forecast:
@Tfmonkey - Anticipated objection: shareholders are owners, and that's why the requirement for fiduciary responsibility exists.. 🤔 and it'd be a fair point.
But what if shareholders weren't owners? What if they bought rights to profit-sharing, contingent on profit being available, but without corporate control? ..or maybe limited corporate control.
In real estate, water rights, mineral rights, surface rights, etc, all exist on the same land. Maybe corporate ownership could be similarly split?
@Tfmonkey - Hoped for upside:
- Allows corporate MGMT to pursue long term vision, at the risk of short term profit.
- Allows corporations to prioritize (or simply comply with public zeitgeist) social trends - for example, instead of off-shoring in strict pursuit of profit, a company could hire domestic at the risk of some profit.
Possible downside:
- greater risk for investors. But maybe that's just part of the gamble?
What do you think? Am I far wrong in that it might broadly help culturally?
@Tfmonkey ➡️ Given all that... I was wondering about the legal requirement of "fiduciary responsibility" being a legal requirement for corporate board members (I think that's it. I'm kinda ignorant on corporate structure to be honest... which is why I'm curious to hear your opinion).
What if we eliminated that legal requirement that corporations must act in order to maximize profits? Like, what's the worst that could happen?
@Tfmonkey - Don't know if it was intentional, but I feel like my question was indirectly answered on air, via superchat. Excellent points were made about corruption being the unavoidable problem, the impermanence of any given system, and capitalism being the only option where freedom is the default.
I've had a thought in the time since. Looking for ways to tinker for improvement.. My gripes with the current system is shortsightedness, and corporate driven cultural destruction. ➡️
Also, I forgot the code word for when TFM is under duress... 🤔
TFM's analysis makes sense, when viewing this in isolation... But when viewed against the backdrop, against the totality of events thus far? ...I can't buy it.
Normies might have a ways to go before they reach fuck it (what I've always called "the Rodney King moment"), but the realization of their situation is finally sinking in for Normies. I'm not pinning any plans or hopes on it, but that's what I think happened.
My personal opinion, for what it's worth? 🤔 I don't think Mossad pulled the trigger. But my gut says they are absolutely involved.
I think the effect this has had on normies, is the same as October 7th had on TFM (and myself). I think a light bulb has gone off for millions of Normies. I doubt that most would ever give it any voice just yet, but the thought has entered their minds... and the progressive conditioning has cracked, for millions.
➡️
•I have no trouble accepting that Israel views America, in the same way that America views Ukraine. Given that, if some young Ukrainian rabble-rouser started rousing rabble in a manner that could even remotely interfere with America's meddling in that foreign land that no one here gives a shit about... what would America do about that without hesitation? 🤔🤔🤔
➡️ Charlie Kirk was controlled or not. And as a side note... whether Charlie Kirk was a grifter or not, would be utterly irrelevant to Israel. Israel is a nation of grifters (with *possible* exception of the Orthodox). Israel would not dismiss Charlie Kirk, or any threat he posed, simply for him being a grifter.
•Why does the analysis assign so much reasoned calculation, to the same country that has *twice* targeted diplomats under the guise of "peace talks"? Why wouldn't Israel be reckless? ➡️
➡️ Israel would fear Charlie Kirk, for the same reason that Israel would fear TikTok. Yes, Tucker Carlson is bigger. And yes, there are many dipshits on the Internet criticizing Israel. But for all we know, Tucker is controlled. I understand Tucker has a family history of deep state activity. For all we know, grifter status notwithstanding, Charlie Kirk was the biggest uncontrolled opposition to Israel. That opposition was still embryonic, and rather tepid. But only Israel would truly know if ➡️
➡️ there's opposition to Netenyahu within Israel itself?" Well... Much like economics, politics also works at any scale - meaning that there's a regime of the Zionist faction of the regime, within Israel itself. And at the top of that pile? (as far as anyone can tell) - Bibi. If Mossad were to be involved... who would give the order? Would Israel take a vote on it? ...no. Bibi would call the shot. And he's currently waging a genocide in the West Bank.
•"Why would Israel fear Charlie Kirk?" ➡️
➡️ Without any firm assertion, it seems at least plausible that assassinating Charlie Kirk could fit into the framework of such a deal. Presumably, BRICS would like to accelerate the collapse of the West while avoiding WWIII. A bugaloo could accomplish that. I mean sure, Israel is so embedded in the regime that they know where the bodies are buried... and so what? Material aid (such as fomenting civil war), is so much more useful to BRICS than such knowledge.
•"Why would Israel do that, when ➡️
➡️ Under normal circumstances, that statement sounds reasonable enough. But we are not in normal circumstances. The US is teetering, and according to many, Israel is on the brink of betraying the US to BRICS.
•"Cui Bono? How would such an act benefit Israel?" I don't think TFM's scope is wide enough on this question. If Israel is about to betray the West to BRICS in order to preserve themselves... 🤔 What do they have to offer BRICS, in order to make that deal? What would BRICS want from Israel?➡️
Joined Dec 2022
