Follow
@BHG - I never read the book, but your observations on divorce seem parallel to the female concept of consent.
When consent can be revoked at a later time, then it loses all meaning as a concept - because there is no way of actually securing it. Consent is no longer consent if it can be revoked on a whim.
A "price to leave" seems a lot like the financial equivalent. If it can be raised at any point in the future, than any such price becomes meaningless.
Women cannot have rights. 🍻
is a weapon against
Ethnic Nationalism
Working Class Men
Ethnic Tradationalism
The entire point of womens rights
is to give them an artifcal leg over
while removing ALL and ANY
conquences
and rewarding them for their selfish, cuntish behavour
Cuckservitism and Christianity
are also onboard with it
because both teams
are the same ((( NWO ))) team