@Based_Accelerationist - women not voting will not make men magically strong.
It will create conditions wherein weak men don't prosper, and don't breed more weak men. And it's not just a genetic thing either.
The insidious nature of women voting is such that it creates conditions where the way in which to prosper, is to exhibit and signal weakness - in order to appeal to women's self-interest (as distinct from women's instinctual drives). Look at the rich beta men as an example of this.
@Based_Accelerationist - the govt will *try* to just enforce the tyranny without masking it as a female issue.
@YoMomz And they would succeed. There are other scapegoats they can use besides women and leftists, as we've seen with covid. It's very easy.
Most men simply lack the will to resist tyranny, they'd much rather enjoy the comfort/status/power that comes with compliance.
You could remove all women from society and very little would change, they're that inconsequential.
The government taking women's rights away would only result in higher birthrates and worsen the overpopulation related issues.
@YoMomz And how exactly will it create the conditions necessary for weak men to leave the gene pool?
I'll even disregard the fact that voting is now a waste of time.
It's like saying if we get rid of the Left, we get rid of cancel culture. It's not leftists, it's not "culture", it's the government. Same with women. If you take women's rights away, the government will just enforce the tyranny without masking it as a female issue. Unless the men are willing to die for freedom, nothing changes.