Joined Dec 2022
I don't think Judaism could be nearly so successful in a Pagan or heathen world. Christianity's emphasis on tolerance, forgiveness, and loving your enemies... is precisely what allows Jews to succeed so well.
Worth noting: Hadrian was pagan.
➡️ talent for banking. Or it could be a propensity for infiltration & subversion. But the same trait that gains them entry and influence, leads to their downfall & expulsion.
But I had an epiphany: Jews don't operate in a vacuum. Their tragic flaw acts symbiotically with the tragic flaw of the larger West: Christianity.
Christianity is what has made the West so susceptible. Basically, through Christianity, the West was "asking for it".
I've been studying classical & archaic Greece, learning about the city-state model.
And as far as I know, the concept of Greek tragedy was rooted in the tragic flaw - a trait someone possesses that leads to glory, but also to their fall from grace.
Jews have a tragic flaw that propels them (as a culture) into power and "glory" (such as it is, & maybe esteem is a better word). Perhaps it's their ability to misrepresent who they are, and what their goals are. Maybe it's their cultural ➡️
@Tfmonkey - Just saw an article on "backlash" to a white house anti-islamophobia campaign... and it sparked a thought that's looking for a devil's advocate.
Regarding: "It is the Jews after all"
We always knew the leftist coalition had irreconcilable contradictions within itself. But seeing things play out often differs from expectations.
Instead of Jews being the puppet masters, could we simply be seeing a fracturing process? 🤔
Food for thought. 🫡🍻
...Civil War started. So naturally I thought that's a perspective that should be included. 🍻
Anywho, any suggestions for library additions from the peanut gallery? 🧐😁
So I've been building a paper library for the post-collapse. And after the technical books, the encyclopedias, the how-to books, and history books... There's the matter of literature to consider. 🤔
The rules for inclusion (insofar as they can be adhered to) are simple: no feminism, no communism, and minimal romanticism.
I just picked up a collection by Washington Irving (rip van Winkle, sleepy hollow), an early American writer who lived through the revolution, and passed before the ➡️
I was listening to the intro of the morning constitutional from last week... and hearing everyone marvel at how bad things have gotten over the course of one partial presidential administration...
And credit where it's due: Obama was right. Does anyone remember that old hot mic quote? "Never underestimate Joe Biden's ability to fuck things up."
Maybe he really is running his own administration. 😂
Kajiwoto Pandora is nice. 👌
...that is all. 🫡
@Tfmonkey - Singapore is hanging people.
And for some reason... 🤔 I thought of TFM. 😂
https://www.yahoo.com/news/singapore-hangs-man-drug-trafficking-112543701.html
What are the odds, that this doesn't mean what the writers think it means? 🤔😏
Oh shit! 😳
The Normies are onto us. 😂 Ready your logical arguments and gird your pimp hands...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/taking-away-civil-rights-must-130007617.html
➡️ bipolar disorder.
Bipolarism is what happens in the absence of a pimp hand. With a pimp-hand, the traits that lead to bipolarism are beneficial... because they allow a woman to adjust to the conditions and decisions imposed upon her, without standing up for herself - which would be counter-productive to survival and reproduction.
To summarize: bipolar disorder isn't a disorder at all. It's a feature. The problem is female autonomy. I mean, maybe - the theory is tentative. 💁🏻♂️
Cheers. 🍻
➡️ someone has to take charge, has to make decisions. And for reasons we all already know, that's the man.
But similar to the way an evolutionarily too-sterile environment can lead to allergies and auto-immune disorders... basically because the immune system is designed for a threat that isn't there, and is more or less bored... A woman's malleable emotions and perception of reality, when left to their own devices absent the enforced guidance of a male partner, will develop into what we call ➡️
➡️ (at least in the bipolar broads I know) is an inability to be consistent in their perceived reality. They seem to make shit up, but it's technically not a lie - because they genuinely believe their own bullshit. And to a rational man (at her mercy in a gynocentric society), dealing with this trait is absolutely maddening. So why are they like that?
Well, I've long maintained that female psychology has evolved to be emotionally inconsistent. In a reproductive pairing (AKA a proto-family) ➡️
Tentative theory on bipolarism:
So I don't know about all of you guys, but it's been awhile since I met a female, and it hasn't come out at some point, that she's bipolar. It is exceedingly common.
This makes me think it's a feature (or some side effect of a feature) of standard female psychology. And I think I might have it.
Females are evolutionarily wired to lack loyalty - which we all already know. And it's a practical and useful trait, in evolutionary terms.
One effect of bipolarism ➡️
Even monks are tempted at times...
I'm passing through a truck stop, and for whatever reason, there's a gaggle of what must've been Mennonite girls - in ankle length dresses and bonnets. And walking past them is a local hoochie mama in skin tight spandex - decent form with ass cheeks out & nipples poking through her top.
I wasn't daydreaming about the hoochie girl. 😂
If I had to summarize the temptation, it was to ask them: "Say, what church do you gals belong to, and uh, how can I join? 😉"
In non marital matters... The charge of "murder", by definition, wouldn't apply to the homicide of an out-group person.
Property rights within the community may be restricted for out-groupers.
The West had christians vs heathens. Islam have the kuffar and whatever the opposite of that is... It's a concept that gets results. Christianity has fucked up in many ways, but losing that concept was one of them.
Food for thought. 🤔🍻
I'm a proponent of arranged marriages for in-group brides. Negotiations should be conducted between a prospective groom, and the bride's father.
And naturally, simping for random females would be verboten... but in cases of mistreatment and whatnot, the bride's natural father would pursue any claims (in the case of broken bones, knocked out teeth, consistent publicly visible bruising, etc).
Other male relatives may pursue a duel, on a mistreated sister/niece/cousin's behalf.
When rebuilding society:
I think it would be useful to adopt ideas that have proven to be useful throughout history. Reject the bad, keep the good, and all that.
Maybe it seems obvious, but most successful civilizations operate with two separate categories of people - an in-group, and an out-group. For example, war-brides come from the out-group... whereas brides from the in-group (the female offspring of a man of the in-group) may have elaborate courtship customs.
Joined Dec 2022
