@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
China is a government, so they can do whatever they want, legal or not.
Yes, holding foreign currency is always a geopolitical vulnerability because you don't control it, as sanctions prove. But the primary effects would be the new country currency would go up like crazy against the other fiat currencies, what would make their purchasing power skyrocket in comparison. For China, it would be a boom too:
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
You're right. It's not the gold currency that's going up, it's the fiat currency that's going down! It would be a race to the bottom among the fiat bullshit.
@Zeb @BowsacNoodle @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
Because it is a race to the bottom
That is why getting lots of things like concrete, metals, food, water, chemicals, in exchange for high inflation is the way to win
For example
Selling your oil to foreigners in exchange for money is a way to lose
Buying oil from foreigners with useless hyper inflated money is a way to win
That is why not drilling for oil but purchasing oil is a good strategy
Hoard your oil underground until collapse
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
Nowadays we have electronic payment systems so velocity of money is not really an issue. The only thing constraining velocity is the government regulation really.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
All their costs would be in Yuan but their wealth would go up along with the gold currency as a reserve and they would benefit from being paid in this currency too. Very similar to how the US vs the Yuan was in the 70s.
The small country would be new singapore/new switzerland.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
In theory, maybe, assuming prices would never go down, which they would, as they had in US for decades in the 17-1800s. But I'll tell you what has happened historically. Never has one country or even an entire continent has been able to hoard all the gold in the world. And all nations have also used silver and copper alongside gold as their daily trading currency, that are much more abundant. Prices would be much lower than today too.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
I worked for a central bank a few years back and if you lose your note, it's gone. Damaged notes are simply replaced: you can go to your bank today with a damaged note, they will catalogue it and give you new bills.
The printing and distribution of new notes and coins are done based on forecast and planning, where the total new amount added is essentially mandated by the government.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
As long as you don't overissue certificate of deposits that cause multiclaim on the same reserve (fractional banking), you don't need to worry. It's the most vital operation in banking, the balance between deposits and loans to avoid bank runs. It keeps the usury and greed in check. But it's always important to hang the bankers that use government to bail themselves out.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
It's ok, if a country wants to hoard your currency, it's fine. First, they would not get access to your currency directly (swap lines) but to your bonds. Second, it would appreciate your gold currency every time they buy, making each purchase more expensive than the previous one. It would be politically suicidal too to put all your reserves in an external currency, as they can always simply sanction you or cancel your transactions.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
Nothing. It would be a great deal for consumers, specially from goldtopia that is getting everything half-off!
It requires a high-level of trust to give foreign countries directly access to your central bank. Read up on Swap Lines, the system already exists today.
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
To all your points, goldtopia has several drawbacks: it curtails government spending, it's very harsh on financial bubbles and it's not forgiving to debtors and failing businesses.
Also, you cannot have a welfare state while on the gold standard.
But the biggest drawback of all is, naturally, war! Since you can't simply print money, you gotta legit sell your bonds or tax your citizens heavily to fund your wars.
@Zeb @BowsacNoodle @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
"the biggest drawback of all is, naturally, war! Since you can't simply print money, you gotta legit sell your bonds or tax your citizens heavily to fund your wars."
That is good because then people will be less likely to want to go to a war unless it is perceived as necessary for them to survive
@BowsacNoodle @shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male
We kinda have an existing system like this today in Peru, where you can use the local soles or even withdraw dollars directly from atms (considered the harder currency). It works fine as long as you have a floating exchanging rate and can exchange one for the other at any bank.
Regarding your experiment, that's exactly how fiat money was created, by circulating gold IOUs along real gold coins, where the IOU was cheaper due to risk.