Unequivocal proof the south did not give a rat's ass about "states rights" and was trying to protect their slave $$.
1. The Dred Scott decision, widely favored in the South, aimed to infringe on the Northern STATES RIGHTS from limiting slavery within their own borders.
2. In the Bleeding Kansas conflict, proslavery forces tried to force the legalization of slavery in Lecompton. This revealed a broader pro-Southern commitment to slavery, often disregarding the will of the people.
1/?
3. Southerners kept trying to force Northern states to help them capture runaway slaves, violating the Northern STATES RIGHTS.
Later on a Fugitive Slave law forced Northerners to help catch slaves at the south's request. They didn't care about the North's states rights
Southerners who claim to be bations of freedom were against the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854 with allowed the states RIGHT to choose if they wanted slavery or not.
It was never about freedom, it was ALWAYS about slave $$.
2/2
What if the reason there are so many similarities between Abraham Lincoln and John F Kennedy is because both were written by the same fiction script writers who tried to pretend it was non fiction and neither actually existed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln%E2%80%93Kennedy_coincidences_urban_legend
Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences urban legend
I do not believe we can know civil war history because the history after Covid 19 was claimed to exist came from the news and was made up stuff
I have seen fake history created live in real life so now I doubt all of history
@shortstories I understand there was alot of covid propaganda but Lincoln DEFINITELY existed.
Do have any idea how hard that would be to get so many people to make false accounts of the same fictional man?
Doubting everything is as unreasonable as being a normie believing everything.
@basedbagel
It would be very easy to hqve a lot of people write fictional accounts about a man