Based Bagel @[email protected]
- Pronouns
- Based/Bagel
Animations, memes, and philosophy.
ZERO TOLERANCE for:
TFM slander
LOW-IQ
Joined Nov 2022
I care about women as a whole on a conceptual level.
A bunch of women that aren't taken care of makes for an unstable society.
Unstable society give way to tyranny.
Tyranny = I lose my freedom.
You came with all this whataboutism.
"What about nurses?
What about barren women?
What about women outlive their husbands?"
Well what about the 1-eyed orphan girl with a peg leg and halitosis?
Just admit women losing their rights makes you uncomfortable.
It's so tiresome.
This is where you and me differ.
I don't actually give a shit about the welfare of unlucky, low iq women. I was just giving you an example of something that works to prove my point
If she wants to blow through her money and starve to death, that's her prerogative.
However, there are systems you can put in place like trusts to protect from that. But that's her mans problem, not mine. 🤷♂️
I don't see how what I said doesn't apply. Seems simple to me:
1. Man marries woman.
2. Man takes care of woman.
3. Man gets life insurance policy to pay other men to take care of her/children in his absence.
Man still supports her indirectly so my point still stands.
NO WOMAN can provide for himself without indirect/direct support from a man.
I know its hard to accept but that is just nature.
That's not true. We have a solution for that already, it's called life insurance.
i see barren women the same way women see incels, not my problem.
But in all seriousness, they have options as well.
1. Become a Nun
2.Find a man who wants a woman but not the kids.
TBH I already 80% agree with you as long as you don't think women should vote. We can work out the details later.
Idk what a barren woman is but I agrees churches and charities can take care of the outliers.
With patriarchy you have strong communities which can handle this sort of thing.
The exception proves the rule. Just because a few autistic lesbians can go to college does not justify the risk of opening the floodgates to demographic collapse.
What do you think will happen when women see other women living freely w/o a man while they are dependent.
Your ideas are sound but fail to take human nature into account.
If you consider subsistence living a functional society than fine, Ill give you that.
But most 1st worlders consider things like indoor plumbing, electricity, postal system etc. to be essential to society functioning.
You say voting is the only problem, but I say it's just the tip of the iceberg.
NO WOMAN can provide for himself without indirect/direct support from a man. Live with a woman and you will quickly find this out.
They can't maintain things like cars/houses alone when they are older and will cry for someone to take care of them.
Women MUST be taken care of. This is the way the world is.
1) You can not have a functioning society without these people. The only thing holding this shit together is gen x/boomers.
2) Yeah if you want to live in rural 1800's.
Modern society requires infrastructure to be built and constantly maintained.
Well said. I agree with that 100%
I didn't disagree with myself.
There are more than 1 cause for a problem.
Welfare is the biggest problem but it's not the only one. Women being able to go to college and provide for themselves without a man WILL NOT GET MARRIED OR HAVE KIDS.
Then we are fucked because someone will have to take care of these women when they get older.
Women lack the foresight/fiscal responsibility for long term thinking like retirement.
Not true.
You NEED police officers, soldiers, skilled tradesmen or society grinds to a SCREECHING HALT.
I agree most people shouldn't be in college.
A hardworking woman is an oxymoron. Maybe back in the day but in modern times, no way!
I don't disagree in principle, but I think it sets a dangerous precedent with devastating consequences.
Maybe just online school AFTER you have a kid and aren't on welfare.
I disagree. Women can cry all they want but if men just SAY NO than we're all good.😎
Taking the vote is just the 1st step so we can fix everything.
Our birthrates are DOGSHIT because women are in college, frolicking around the world wasting time.
We tried that, the women will just cry segregation and play the victim to get in boys schools.
Then they will distract the men, degrade the intuition and not have kids and we're SCREWED!
Sorry @khaosklub but that won't work.
We NEED women to have babies, this is non-negotiable.
If you send women to school, they have no babies and our society goes extinct.
I understand it isn't fair, but we shouldn't all go extinct so that a small # of women can go to school.
There is no female-dominated profession that is essential to society functioning.
Nurses are just doctor's assistants and they only do it so they can marry doctors.
Big Government is a direct cause of female empowerment. They have a BIOLOGICAL imperative to be taken care of.
Your views make sense in principle. The problem is women don't understand/care about principle and they degrade the quality of any institution they inhabit.
This is pure survival, If you send a critical mass of women to school, kiss your birthrate goodbye.
We'll have to agree to disagree on this.
When dealing with women,children it's best if rules lack nuance as their brains do.
If you let women in college then they will stop having kids and use the authority of academia to let all women in and you're finished.
Your point makes sense logically, but we are not dealing with logical creatures.
- Pronouns
- Based/Bagel
Animations, memes, and philosophy.
ZERO TOLERANCE for:
TFM slander
LOW-IQ
Joined Nov 2022
