Joined Jul 2022
doggel
boosted
@sickburnbro We'd sooner sacrifice airline passengers than tell unqualified brown people "no"
doggel
boosted
Fluffy animal holds cross and says,
"stay away Jew"
doggel
boosted
SaṁainGoat
> They actually argue that all the evidence we have, like the reports and documents I mentioned earlier, were forged after World War II by people working for the global jewish community.
False. The earliest examples of holohoax forgery occurred during the war, at Katyn.
And that's assuming we don't count attempts during WW1 to suggest the germans were deliberately gassing jewish civilians (they were forced to admit this was propaganda after the war) or attempts throughout the 19th century to meme the idea that 6 million jews were either murdered or about to be murdered (see below).
> According to these deniers, there was a whole network of forgers who meticulously created these documents. They even went as far as using typewriters that perfectly matched the ones used by the German units that supposedly wrote the documents. And get this: these forgers supposedly planted thousands of these impeccable forgeries in different archives all across Europe, making sure they were placed in the exact right files and sequence.
Mmm hmm. And as proof of this meticulous paper trail being found in meticulous order despite the reich being smashed to bits we have... the word of a group of people famous for faking atrocities and spinning lies.
Or as a more plausible scenario they needed an excuse for the extreme measures they took during the war and typed up some "atrocities" on captured typewriters. Not exactly difficult to do.
> If these forgers were so talented and determined, why couldn't they produce the one piece of paper that deniers demand as 'proof' of the genocide—the infamous order from Hitler authorizing the destruction of the jews? You would think that if these forgers were so capable, they would have come up with that piece of evidence, right?
Because it hadn't been demanded yet. And by the time it was demanded and they realised it was important they had no way to "find" it that wouldn't be obviously fake.
But of course the claim of the holocaust isn't that some germans went around shooting some enemy civilians. That would make them merely as bad as some of their more mild mannered enemies. The claim is that they rounded up *millions* of enemy civilians and systematically killed them using a variety of bizarrely inefficient methods while also helping them increase their numbers, give birth to a new generation of enemies and evacuating them from areas threatened by enemy bombing.
The claims regarding the holocaust are so schitzophrenic they'd give you a dual personality just looking at them.
False. The earliest examples of holohoax forgery occurred during the war, at Katyn.
And that's assuming we don't count attempts during WW1 to suggest the germans were deliberately gassing jewish civilians (they were forced to admit this was propaganda after the war) or attempts throughout the 19th century to meme the idea that 6 million jews were either murdered or about to be murdered (see below).
> According to these deniers, there was a whole network of forgers who meticulously created these documents. They even went as far as using typewriters that perfectly matched the ones used by the German units that supposedly wrote the documents. And get this: these forgers supposedly planted thousands of these impeccable forgeries in different archives all across Europe, making sure they were placed in the exact right files and sequence.
Mmm hmm. And as proof of this meticulous paper trail being found in meticulous order despite the reich being smashed to bits we have... the word of a group of people famous for faking atrocities and spinning lies.
Or as a more plausible scenario they needed an excuse for the extreme measures they took during the war and typed up some "atrocities" on captured typewriters. Not exactly difficult to do.
> If these forgers were so talented and determined, why couldn't they produce the one piece of paper that deniers demand as 'proof' of the genocide—the infamous order from Hitler authorizing the destruction of the jews? You would think that if these forgers were so capable, they would have come up with that piece of evidence, right?
Because it hadn't been demanded yet. And by the time it was demanded and they realised it was important they had no way to "find" it that wouldn't be obviously fake.
But of course the claim of the holocaust isn't that some germans went around shooting some enemy civilians. That would make them merely as bad as some of their more mild mannered enemies. The claim is that they rounded up *millions* of enemy civilians and systematically killed them using a variety of bizarrely inefficient methods while also helping them increase their numbers, give birth to a new generation of enemies and evacuating them from areas threatened by enemy bombing.
The claims regarding the holocaust are so schitzophrenic they'd give you a dual personality just looking at them.
🌿 
:ignucius:
doggel
boosted
“Evil always takes advantage of ambiguity.”
-G.K. Chesterton
this is why the system hates us autists; overwhelmingly male & insistent on formalism. thank you friends.
doggel
boosted
doggel
boosted
doggel
boosted
doggel
boosted
The crusades were justified self-defense and didn't go far enough.
doggel
boosted
doggel
boosted
No way will this last, but still nice to see the truth breaking through to the mainstream
doggel
boosted
"Frankism was a Sabbatean Jewish religious movement of the 18th and 19th centuries,[1] centered on the leadership of the Jewish Messiah claimant Jacob Frank. Frank rejected religious norms and said that his followers were obligated to transgress as many moral boundaries as possible. At its height it claimed perhaps 50,000 followers, primarily Jews living in Poland, as well as in Central and Eastern Europe"
In other words the Ashkenazi & Sephardic "Jewish" territories
doggel
boosted
>Trust in the government and parliament has tumbled from 74% in 2022 to 39%, and 58% to 21%, respectively, according to Anton Hrushetskyi, executive director at the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology
21% trust in the government in Ukraine currently
21% trust in the government in Ukraine currently
doggel
boosted
Fresh drop revealing more info about the regime's fascist activities.
https://nitter.poast.org/shellenberger/status/1729537450752811097?t=VO-HiXJBYhNBkbtIwbiKDg&s=19
doggel
boosted
How do you remember third person singular pronouns in Hebrew?
Use this saying
"Who is he? He is she?"
Who in Hebrew means he in English
He in Hebrew means she in English
Does that remind you of drag quuen story hour?
73 seconds
1 minute and 13 seconds
Mourning media
@mttaggart out of self preservation and survival. Example, where I live a lot of scammers and robbers have appeared using telephone calls, and because of that there are now private services to flag and detect malicious callers, communities have come together to form plans and countermeasures, people are helping amd collaborating with each other, and all of that is born out of individual self preservation and survival.
Mourning media
@mttaggart suddenly brcome critical thinkers, I said that we as a society will have to incentivize, teach or whatever is needed to do if the society wants to compete/survive against others that do manage to do it right. Finally, truth has value for oneself and one only, since it is oneself that decides for one's life, that's why media tends to prioritize things other than truth, but now that it is become too obvious, more people HAVE TO value truth (part 3)
Mourning media
@mttaggart I said that Clarkesworld had a demand for some help, not that he received more demand of publications from the readers. That's how starts, some people start with the need of filtering out the bs and after a long time pases, a whole economy is built around it, and I did mention that it would be a long painful process but I think slowing things down will only make said painful process last longer. Third, I never said that people (part 2)
Mourning media
@mttaggart You completely misunderstood everything I said. First, I do prefer today's era of lack of regulation, I know you may not value it, but I'm native south american, regulation has been destroying traditions and communities from a long time now, and before that we were even property, as certain government regulations went away, my people have been able to actually live more according to our culture while still participating in society. Second, (part 1)
doggel
boosted
Joined Jul 2022
