I have never heard of anyone being deprived of the right to eat due to lack of employment.
Far as I see it, the whole right to eat phrase is incorrect. How about this, it is Ur own responsibility to feed yourself?
If U grow Ur own food or work or run Ur own business or how U choose to provide is Ur own deal.
Farmers being forced to sell their land due to new inheritance laws is Jewry. It is because farmers are independent. Thus they have (too much) freedom.
Ur idea would men the end of all Nations.
Only the Jew would wish for such a thing. For it would also mean the end of our culture and race.
Blood and honour. A people without borders will soon cease to exist.
The idea that people would be able to cooperate on some "international land" is a pipe dream. The strong would rule over the weak and unless those most advanced used weapons to defend themselves it would mean that those races of the many would triumph.
As it is right now there is no where that I can exit from a territory recognised as owned by a government in the United Nations to step unto land not owned by the United Nations and start my own community with borders to prevent entry of those who wish to msliciously exploit me such as but not limited to practitioners of the Kike religion, lifestyle or culture
But should work be a choice?
In my book, those who refuse to work does not deserve to eat. Because otherwise they are assuming the right to eat the fruits of others work.
Unless someone are unable to work due to medical reasons. There can be more exceptions too. Like a mother who have lost her Husband and old people who have worked their whole life and deserve to get some help in old days.
But this forced to work at gun point sounds like Jewish deep thinking ideas
You could sleep somewhere that is no one's personal property but the government claims to own and get arrested so you must buy or rent your own personal or private property
Because you can not sleep on property with no rightful human owner you must pay property taxes
Each of the United Nations recognised givernments essentially claims to own all the land the other governments do not claim to own and I would argue they can not rightfully own 100% of the land they claim
This example would be better if U skipped the first part. If U sleep at someone else's property without their approval or consent U are basically trespassing.
But property tax is theft at gun point. Basically we are serfs.
Officials claiming to represent Myanmmar told corporations to shut off the web and then employees of those corporations shut off the web
The officials were not able to shut it off themself
Or maybe a third party shut off the internet and claimed the government shut it off
Or maybe people claimed Myanmar shut off the internet but that never actually happened
Everyone is forced at gun point to go to work because
If you sleep at property that you do not own or rent then you are arrested at gun point
If you own property then you pay property tax at gun point & if you rent then you pay the land lords property tax at gun point with extra steps
Property tax can only be paid in certain currency
The government decides who gets that currency initially and you work for the first receivers of the currency at gun point with extra steps