@shortstories @freepatriot

This example would be better if U skipped the first part. If U sleep at someone else's property without their approval or consent U are basically trespassing.

But property tax is theft at gun point. Basically we are serfs.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

You could sleep somewhere that is no one's personal property but the government claims to own and get arrested so you must buy or rent your own personal or private property

Because you can not sleep on property with no rightful human owner you must pay property taxes

Each of the United Nations recognised givernments essentially claims to own all the land the other governments do not claim to own and I would argue they can not rightfully own 100% of the land they claim

@shortstories @freepatriot

I can see the point U are trying to make.

And I would still like to separate the arguments.

The property tax thing is right up slavery, Jewry.

But the Nations natural resources, such as land should rightfully belong to the Nation. Or it will become objects of foreign private speculation.

But a citizen of the Nation should have the right to use the common land for camping. But this right should not be extended to foreigners.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

You can always leave

Bitbutter

Youtube

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fasTSY-dB-s

There are only two people on an island

Jeff asserts he owns all the island

Jeff is the government

The other guy is the tax slave

@EvolLove @freepatriot

I would suggest that land that is within a certain distance or greater of any community should be treated like international waters and that the geographical size of governments should not extend much beyond the geographic borders of local communities

That disputes in this area treated like international waters can be settled by arbitrated agreements by nearby communities

That someone should need to form a community near the resources to claim them

& no more money

@shortstories @freepatriot

Ur idea would men the end of all Nations.

Only the Jew would wish for such a thing. For it would also mean the end of our culture and race.

Blood and honour. A people without borders will soon cease to exist.

The idea that people would be able to cooperate on some "international land" is a pipe dream. The strong would rule over the weak and unless those most advanced used weapons to defend themselves it would mean that those races of the many would triumph.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

I am not proposing an absense of borders

I am proposing making the borders smaller and making the borders into borders of entry but not borders of exit

Having area claimed by no community allows people to set up new communities bound by different rules with their own borders of entry

Having every where claimed by a government prevents competing communities from coming to existence allowing a monopoly of UN recognised Kike approved governments

@EvolLove @freepatriot

As it is right now there is no where that I can exit from a territory recognised as owned by a government in the United Nations to step unto land not owned by the United Nations and start my own community with borders to prevent entry of those who wish to msliciously exploit me such as but not limited to practitioners of the Kike religion, lifestyle or culture

@shortstories @freepatriot

But should work be a choice?

In my book, those who refuse to work does not deserve to eat. Because otherwise they are assuming the right to eat the fruits of others work.

Unless someone are unable to work due to medical reasons. There can be more exceptions too. Like a mother who have lost her Husband and old people who have worked their whole life and deserve to get some help in old days.

But this forced to work at gun point sounds like Jewish deep thinking ideas

People will work if given the opportunity to in most cases, just to have some sort of purpose 😏 the ones that don't wanna can be fixed by shaming. The shameless get to live like an ascetic

@RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @freepatriot @shortstories

[People will work if given the opportunity to in most cases]

No. this is not true. This is a common falsity that many believe in.

Truth is that people will choose not to work if given the opportunity. This is the reality we see proof of each day.

Immigrants who have been given free house, food and money will almost never choose to work when given the opportunity.

This is eroding our foundation of morality. Soon no one want to work.

Oh I'm completely excluding all brown and black critters 😏 those are just weeds

@RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @freepatriot @shortstories

Even if U exclude brown and blacks. Most people would choose not to work if they were given the opportunity. Such as universal income.

Though it is true that all black and brown would choose not to work. So would the majority of our own race.

It is in the nature of humanity. The whole reason for the work mentality within the Aryan race can be traced to a historical need to survive.

But this also made us strong and independent.

@EvolLove @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @freepatriot

I support the complete abolition of money but if you are going to have money and you do universal basic income it would not necessarily be a problem so long as the income is only enough to support one adult person and no extra money is given to women for having children

This would prevent people who do not work from having enough money to reproduce and raise a family

Only those who work could afford to have a high birth rate

@RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare @freepatriot @shortstories

Take me for example. If I didn't have to work I might find purpose in lifting weights and sport fishing. And improving my own home.

I could think of many things that would give me purpose.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

Work is not the same as employment

People should have a right to eat without being employed so long as they work or someone who does work chooses to bestow charity upon them such as for example feeding their own baby food that the baby never worked to earn

A farmer who grows their own food but does not sell it might work but be unemployed

A farmer who is forced to sell their labor or property to a third party to pay property taxes on their farm land is employed

@shortstories @freepatriot

I have never heard of anyone being deprived of the right to eat due to lack of employment.

Far as I see it, the whole right to eat phrase is incorrect. How about this, it is Ur own responsibility to feed yourself?

If U grow Ur own food or work or run Ur own business or how U choose to provide is Ur own deal.

Farmers being forced to sell their land due to new inheritance laws is Jewry. It is because farmers are independent. Thus they have (too much) freedom.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

If you have to pay property tax to own land to grow food on then thisvmeans you must pay tax to eat

And paying taxrs is forced employment with extra steps

And someone who is forced to be your employee and does not choose to be your employee is your slave

If you could work to grow food on your own land without being employeed then that might not be slavery