FreedomPatriot @[email protected]

When elections were annulled in Romania, Thierry Breton, the former EU commissioner, said: "We did it in Romania, and we will do it in Germany."

@EvolLove @freepatriot

I am not proposing an absense of borders

I am proposing making the borders smaller and making the borders into borders of entry but not borders of exit

Having area claimed by no community allows people to set up new communities bound by different rules with their own borders of entry

Having every where claimed by a government prevents competing communities from coming to existence allowing a monopoly of UN recognised Kike approved governments

@EvolLove @freepatriot

If you have to pay property tax to own land to grow food on then thisvmeans you must pay tax to eat

And paying taxrs is forced employment with extra steps

And someone who is forced to be your employee and does not choose to be your employee is your slave

If you could work to grow food on your own land without being employeed then that might not be slavery

@EvolLove @freepatriot

Work is not the same as employment

People should have a right to eat without being employed so long as they work or someone who does work chooses to bestow charity upon them such as for example feeding their own baby food that the baby never worked to earn

A farmer who grows their own food but does not sell it might work but be unemployed

A farmer who is forced to sell their labor or property to a third party to pay property taxes on their farm land is employed

@shortstories @freepatriot

I can see the point U are trying to make.

And I would still like to separate the arguments.

The property tax thing is right up slavery, Jewry.

But the Nations natural resources, such as land should rightfully belong to the Nation. Or it will become objects of foreign private speculation.

But a citizen of the Nation should have the right to use the common land for camping. But this right should not be extended to foreigners.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

You can always leave

Bitbutter

Youtube

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fasTSY-dB-s

There are only two people on an island

Jeff asserts he owns all the island

Jeff is the government

The other guy is the tax slave

@EvolLove @freepatriot

I would suggest that land that is within a certain distance or greater of any community should be treated like international waters and that the geographical size of governments should not extend much beyond the geographic borders of local communities

That disputes in this area treated like international waters can be settled by arbitrated agreements by nearby communities

That someone should need to form a community near the resources to claim them

& no more money

https://immigrantinvest.com/blog/no-property-tax-countries/

https://www.businessinsider.com/sailed-full-time-after-leaving-job-challenges-lifestyle-benefits-2025-10?op=1

@shortstories @freepatriot

I have never heard of anyone being deprived of the right to eat due to lack of employment.

Far as I see it, the whole right to eat phrase is incorrect. How about this, it is Ur own responsibility to feed yourself?

If U grow Ur own food or work or run Ur own business or how U choose to provide is Ur own deal.

Farmers being forced to sell their land due to new inheritance laws is Jewry. It is because farmers are independent. Thus they have (too much) freedom.

@shortstories @freepatriot

Ur idea would men the end of all Nations.

Only the Jew would wish for such a thing. For it would also mean the end of our culture and race.

Blood and honour. A people without borders will soon cease to exist.

The idea that people would be able to cooperate on some "international land" is a pipe dream. The strong would rule over the weak and unless those most advanced used weapons to defend themselves it would mean that those races of the many would triumph.

@EvolLove @freepatriot

As it is right now there is no where that I can exit from a territory recognised as owned by a government in the United Nations to step unto land not owned by the United Nations and start my own community with borders to prevent entry of those who wish to msliciously exploit me such as but not limited to practitioners of the Kike religion, lifestyle or culture

@shortstories @freepatriot

But should work be a choice?

In my book, those who refuse to work does not deserve to eat. Because otherwise they are assuming the right to eat the fruits of others work.

Unless someone are unable to work due to medical reasons. There can be more exceptions too. Like a mother who have lost her Husband and old people who have worked their whole life and deserve to get some help in old days.

But this forced to work at gun point sounds like Jewish deep thinking ideas

@EvolLove @freepatriot

You could sleep somewhere that is no one's personal property but the government claims to own and get arrested so you must buy or rent your own personal or private property

Because you can not sleep on property with no rightful human owner you must pay property taxes

Each of the United Nations recognised givernments essentially claims to own all the land the other governments do not claim to own and I would argue they can not rightfully own 100% of the land they claim

@shortstories @freepatriot

This example would be better if U skipped the first part. If U sleep at someone else's property without their approval or consent U are basically trespassing.

But property tax is theft at gun point. Basically we are serfs.

If governments cannot shut off the Internet then why did the Myanmar turn off the web?

@freepatriot

Officials claiming to represent Myanmmar told corporations to shut off the web and then employees of those corporations shut off the web

The officials were not able to shut it off themself

Or maybe a third party shut off the internet and claimed the government shut it off

Or maybe people claimed Myanmar shut off the internet but that never actually happened