Everyone is forced at gun point to go to work because
If you sleep at property that you do not own or rent then you are arrested at gun point
If you own property then you pay property tax at gun point & if you rent then you pay the land lords property tax at gun point with extra steps
Property tax can only be paid in certain currency
The government decides who gets that currency initially and you work for the first receivers of the currency at gun point with extra steps
This example would be better if U skipped the first part. If U sleep at someone else's property without their approval or consent U are basically trespassing.
But property tax is theft at gun point. Basically we are serfs.
You could sleep somewhere that is no one's personal property but the government claims to own and get arrested so you must buy or rent your own personal or private property
Because you can not sleep on property with no rightful human owner you must pay property taxes
Each of the United Nations recognised givernments essentially claims to own all the land the other governments do not claim to own and I would argue they can not rightfully own 100% of the land they claim
I can see the point U are trying to make.
And I would still like to separate the arguments.
The property tax thing is right up slavery, Jewry.
But the Nations natural resources, such as land should rightfully belong to the Nation. Or it will become objects of foreign private speculation.
But a citizen of the Nation should have the right to use the common land for camping. But this right should not be extended to foreigners.
I would suggest that land that is within a certain distance or greater of any community should be treated like international waters and that the geographical size of governments should not extend much beyond the geographic borders of local communities
That disputes in this area treated like international waters can be settled by arbitrated agreements by nearby communities
That someone should need to form a community near the resources to claim them
& no more money
I am not proposing an absense of borders
I am proposing making the borders smaller and making the borders into borders of entry but not borders of exit
Having area claimed by no community allows people to set up new communities bound by different rules with their own borders of entry
Having every where claimed by a government prevents competing communities from coming to existence allowing a monopoly of UN recognised Kike approved governments
As it is right now there is no where that I can exit from a territory recognised as owned by a government in the United Nations to step unto land not owned by the United Nations and start my own community with borders to prevent entry of those who wish to msliciously exploit me such as but not limited to practitioners of the Kike religion, lifestyle or culture
@shortstories @freepatriot
Ur idea would men the end of all Nations.
Only the Jew would wish for such a thing. For it would also mean the end of our culture and race.
Blood and honour. A people without borders will soon cease to exist.
The idea that people would be able to cooperate on some "international land" is a pipe dream. The strong would rule over the weak and unless those most advanced used weapons to defend themselves it would mean that those races of the many would triumph.